You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current spec says that the form element maps by default to the form role and the form role in the ARIA 1.2 spec says that the form role is required to have an accessible name. I don't think we want accessible names on every form element. Something has to change, seems the easy change is to make the form role conditional on the presence of an accessible name, similar to the wording for the section element.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Aria 1.3 adds more clarity here. And html aam is already updated to indicate that a form landmark needs a name, but unnamed the form role may still be exposed, but not as a landmark
since aria in html doesn’t define what roles each element has, any necessary change wouldn’t start here.
The current spec says that the
form
element maps by default to theform
role and theform
role in the ARIA 1.2 spec says that theform
role is required to have an accessible name. I don't think we want accessible names on everyform
element. Something has to change, seems the easy change is to make theform
role conditional on the presence of an accessible name, similar to the wording for thesection
element.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: