Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

How should the industry tackle such issues? #19

Open
lianghai opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

How should the industry tackle such issues? #19

lianghai opened this issue Oct 13, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@lianghai
Copy link
Contributor

(Open to suggestions about a more informative title.)

I reported this following issue to the Noto project earlier:

https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-fonts/issues/1761
GUNJALA GONDI VIRAMA behaves inconsistently with the Unicode Standard’s current definition

It’s quite a typical situation. Font producers find something they need to represent and just go ahead and make their fonts to show it, without considering the impact on character identities and text interchange. The industry needs to have a more systematic solution.

This issue is meant to be an invite to some general discussions.

@lianghai lianghai added the question Further information is requested label Oct 13, 2020
@lianghai lianghai changed the title How should the industry tackle such issues How should the industry tackle such issues? Oct 13, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant