You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the concepts within DPV-OWL are structured semantically in the same manner as other forms (i.e. RDFS, SKOS). OWL permits declaration of additional axioms such as that for disjointness, class-based relations, and composition (e.g. subclasses). This issue is intended to discuss what these axioms are, and how to provide them as code. Suggestions include adding them directly to relevant files during code generation, or providing them in a separate file but under the same namespace to enable optional inclusion.
Edit: also provide inverse relations between properties.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the concepts within DPV-OWL are structured semantically in the same manner as other forms (i.e. RDFS, SKOS). OWL permits declaration of additional axioms such as that for disjointness, class-based relations, and composition (e.g. subclasses). This issue is intended to discuss what these axioms are, and how to provide them as code. Suggestions include adding them directly to relevant files during code generation, or providing them in a separate file but under the same namespace to enable optional inclusion.
Edit: also provide inverse relations between properties.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: