Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 29, 2019. It is now read-only.

[TERMINOLOGY] DID Fragment issues #126

Closed
mwherman2000 opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

[TERMINOLOGY] DID Fragment issues #126

mwherman2000 opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
editorial Editorial changes to the specification

Comments

@mwherman2000
Copy link

In https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/#terminology, it states...

DID Fragment
The portion of a DID reference that follows the first hash sign character ("#"). A DID fragment uses the same syntax as a URI fragment. See section 5.5. Note that a DID fragment MUST immediately follow a DID. If a DID reference includes a DID path followed by a fragment, that fragment is NOT a DID fragment.

  1. RE: "Note that a DID fragment MUST immediately follow a DID." Not true.
    The first hash sign character ("#"), if present, must immediately follow the the DID. The DID Fragment, if present, must immediately follow the first hash sign character ("#").
@mwherman2000 mwherman2000 changed the title [Terminology] DID Fragment issues [TERMINOLOGY] DID Fragment issues Dec 20, 2018
@rhiaro rhiaro added the editorial Editorial changes to the specification label Jan 25, 2019
@mwherman2000 mwherman2000 mentioned this issue Jan 30, 2019
@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link

Addressed in #168.

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Member

I think this has been fixed by #189. Closing.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
editorial Editorial changes to the specification
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants