-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Router scroll behaviour, fix #1071 #1075
Conversation
@@ -62,15 +62,25 @@ export function createApp (isServer) { | |||
base: siteData.base, | |||
mode: 'history', | |||
fallback: false, | |||
routes | |||
routes, | |||
scrollBehavior (to, from, savedPosition) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about cases when to.hash
is set?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That interferes with plugin-active-header-links
unfortunately. It causes the website to jump around when the anchor is being pushed.
But jumping to an anchor still works with the native browser behaviour.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright perfect, then i guess in the old implementation it was just to disable scroll behavior via some flag.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah that would make sense here, too! Have to check that out later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR seems to be a revert of 5b0cdcf#diff-4371af1d933b93cddb889e7b132d150a.
Please address comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Summary
closes #1071
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)
If changing the UI of default theme, please provide the before/after screenshot:
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)
If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:
The PR fulfills these requirements:
fix #xxx[,#xxx]
, where "xxx" is the issue number)You have tested in the following browsers: (Providing a detailed version will be better.)
If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:
→ see Add native-like scroll behaviour when changing routes #1071
To avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a feature request issue first and wait for approval before working on it.
Other information:
I removed
smooth-scroll
as it was causing issues when used withactive-header-links
.