Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Type 作为动词的时候的译法 #59

Closed
Jinjiang opened this issue Jan 30, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Type 作为动词的时候的译法 #59

Jinjiang opened this issue Jan 30, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@Jinjiang
Copy link
Member

目前我看到的有两种译法,个人觉得都可以 (可能还有其它译法)

  • 类型化
    • the emit function can also be typed using either runtime declaration OR type declaration
    • 可以通过基于类型的声明或运行时声明让 emit 函数类型化
  • 标注类型
    • Typing ref()
    • ref() 标注类型

大家觉得哪个更合适,觉得是否有必要统一一下译法,或是否还有别的建议?

谢谢

@Jinjiang
Copy link
Member Author

Jinjiang commented Jan 30, 2022

“xx化”的译法是我第一次遇到,个人觉得这样的词通常对应英文的“xxxlize”,但这里直观感觉也是不错的翻译。

“标注类型”算是比较保守的直译,略显得有一点啰嗦,但不影响阅读和理解

@Justineo
Copy link
Contributor

我选“为……标注类型”。

@sudongyuer
Copy link
Contributor

标注类型 我认为更佳

@ShenQingchuan
Copy link
Member

我赞同 E0 老师的看法,

  • 主动语态的形式:“为 ... 标注类型”
  • 以被动语态的形式时:“被标注类型”

@Jinjiang
Copy link
Member Author

Jinjiang commented Feb 5, 2022

那我们统一到“标注类型”吧。
稍后我来更新 wiki 并批量替换。

谢谢

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants