Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Topic wise statistics retrieval #2

Open
Gotham25 opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #3
Open

Topic wise statistics retrieval #2

Gotham25 opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #3
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Gotham25
Copy link

Gotham25 commented Oct 4, 2019

Hey,

I had a look on your queue data-structure. It exactly satisfies what I need. Good job on your work on this. One more thing, Can I have topic wise statistics like, total messages in a topic and number of messages processed so far in a topic and total topics created so far ?.

I'm sure there's a way to do/retrieve this.

Let me know your thoughts on the same.

@void666 void666 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 4, 2019
@void666
Copy link
Owner

void666 commented Oct 4, 2019

Are you referring to runtime analysis? Like that of kafka? Can be written as wrapper APIs on top of the code. Open to PRs :)

@Gotham25 Gotham25 linked a pull request Oct 8, 2019 that will close this issue
4 tasks
@Gotham25
Copy link
Author

Gotham25 commented Oct 8, 2019

Yep. Something like that. I created a PR for the same. Haven't added any tests yet as I'm having some issue in running the tests. Can you let me know how to setup the environment for testing ?.

@Gotham25
Copy link
Author

Hey @void66, Any update on the above PR ?.

@void666
Copy link
Owner

void666 commented Oct 21, 2019

I haven't had the time to test it out yet. Will push to next release. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants