-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
[Feat] allow annotation on router pod #743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: nargit <[email protected]>
Summary of ChangesHello @NargiT, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the Helm chart for the router component by enabling the configuration of custom annotations directly on the router pods. This provides increased flexibility for users to integrate the router with other systems, such as Istio, which rely on pod-level annotations for specific feature activation or configuration. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new feature to allow specifying annotations for the router pod, which is useful for integration with service meshes like Istio. The changes correctly update the values.schema.json and deployment-router.yaml. However, there is an indentation issue in the Helm template for the router deployment that would result in invalid YAML. I've provided a comment with a suggested fix to correct the indentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds support for pod annotations in the router deployment configuration. This allows users to specify custom annotations for router pods via the Helm values.
- Added
podAnnotationsfield to therouterSpecschema - Implemented pod annotations rendering in the router deployment template
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| helm/values.schema.json | Added podAnnotations property to routerSpec schema definition |
| helm/templates/deployment-router.yaml | Added template logic to render pod annotations in router deployment |
| helm/templates/_helpers.tpl | Added blank line (whitespace only change) |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Signed-off-by: nargit <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: NargiT <[email protected]>
| release: "router" | ||
|
|
||
| # -- Customized pod annotations for the router pods | ||
| podAnnotations: {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does service need annotation under some conditions too? If there is a possibility, would it be better to make this annotation more general to service too?
Some feature in istio are applied on Pod resource. This PR aim to add this feature so it easier to configure.
-swhen doinggit commit[Bugfix],[Feat], and[CI].Detailed Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to production-stack! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps us maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Please try to classify PRs for easy understanding of the type of changes. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]for bug fixes.[CI/Build]for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]for documentation fixes and improvements.[Feat]for new features in the cluster (e.g., autoscaling, disaggregated prefill, etc.).[Router]for changes to thevllm_router(e.g., routing algorithm, router observability, etc.).[Misc]for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
pre-committo format your code. SeeREADME.mdfor installation.DCO and Signed-off-by
When contributing changes to this project, you must agree to the DCO. Commits must include a
Signed-off-by:header which certifies agreement with the terms of the DCO.Using
-swithgit commitwill automatically add this header.What to Expect for the Reviews
We aim to address all PRs in a timely manner. If no one reviews your PR within 5 days, please @-mention one of YuhanLiu11
, Shaoting-Feng or ApostaC.