Skip to content

Conversation

@JounQin
Copy link
Member

@JounQin JounQin commented Jun 10, 2025

πŸ€– New release

  • unrs_resolver: 1.7.13 -> 1.8.0 (⚠ API breaking changes)

⚠ unrs_resolver breaking changes

--- failure constructible_struct_adds_field: externally-constructible struct adds field ---

Description:
A pub struct constructible with a struct literal has a new pub field. Existing struct literals must be updated to include the new field.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/struct-expr.html
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.41.0/src/lints/constructible_struct_adds_field.ron

Failed in:
  field ResolveOptions.module_type in /tmp/.tmpCnHCfn/unrs-resolver/src/options.rs:184

--- failure enum_variant_missing: pub enum variant removed or renamed ---

Description:
A publicly-visible enum has at least one variant that is no longer available under its prior name. It may have been renamed or removed entirely.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#item-remove
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.41.0/src/lints/enum_variant_missing.ron

Failed in:
  variant ResolveError::JSON, previously in file /tmp/.tmpeLByK0/unrs_resolver/src/error.rs:74

--- failure method_parameter_count_changed: pub method parameter count changed ---

Description:
A publicly-visible method now takes a different number of parameters.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#fn-change-arity
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.41.0/src/lints/method_parameter_count_changed.ron

Failed in:
  unrs_resolver::ResolveError::from_serde_json_error now takes 2 parameters instead of 3, in /tmp/.tmpCnHCfn/unrs-resolver/src/error.rs:117

--- failure struct_pub_field_missing: pub struct's pub field removed or renamed ---

Description:
A publicly-visible struct has at least one public field that is no longer available under its prior name. It may have been renamed or removed entirely.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#item-remove
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.41.0/src/lints/struct_pub_field_missing.ron

Failed in:
  field content of struct JSONError, previously in file /tmp/.tmpeLByK0/unrs_resolver/src/error.rs:146

--- failure trait_method_added: pub trait method added ---

Description:
A non-sealed public trait added a new method without a default implementation, which breaks downstream implementations of the trait
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/semver.html#trait-new-item-no-default
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.41.0/src/lints/trait_method_added.ron

Failed in:
  trait method unrs_resolver::CachedPath::is_node_modules in file /tmp/.tmpCnHCfn/unrs-resolver/src/cache.rs:65
  trait method unrs_resolver::CachedPath::inside_node_modules in file /tmp/.tmpCnHCfn/unrs-resolver/src/cache.rs:67

--- failure trait_method_requires_different_generic_type_params: trait method now requires a different number of generic type parameters ---

Description:
A trait method now requires a different number of generic type parameters than it used to. Calls or implementations of this trait method using the previous number of generic types will be broken.
        ref: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/generics.html
       impl: https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/tree/v0.41.0/src/lints/trait_method_requires_different_generic_type_params.ron

Failed in:
  CachedPath::normalize_with (1 -> 2 generic types) in /tmp/.tmpCnHCfn/unrs-resolver/src/cache.rs:96
Changelog

1.8.0 - 2025-06-11

Features

Chore

Contributors


This PR was generated with release-plz.


Important

Release version 1.8.0 of unrs_resolver with updated dependencies and documentation.

  • Version Update:
    • Bump unrs_resolver version to 1.8.0 in Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock, and package.json.
  • Dependencies:
    • Update all dependencies to their latest versions.
  • Scripts:
    • Update postinstall script in package.json to use version 1.8.0.
  • Documentation:
    • Add changelog entry for version 1.8.0, including new features and contributors.

This description was created by Ellipsis for bc7a60b. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.


Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated package version to 1.8.0.
    • Upgraded all dependencies.
    • Updated post-install scripts to reflect the new version.
  • Documentation
    • Added a changelog entry for version 1.8.0, highlighting new features and contributors.

@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-06-10T14-02-03Z branch from 2aa2489 to 8b7a02d Compare June 10, 2025 14:02
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This update increments the project version to 1.8.0 across multiple configuration files and documents the release in the changelog. The changelog entry highlights a runtime fallback feature for webcontainer, a merge from the upstream resolver repository, and credits contributors. No changes to code, functionality, or public interfaces are included.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Added release entry for version 1.8.0, describing runtime fallback feature, upstream merge, and credits.
Cargo.toml Updated package version from 1.7.13 to 1.8.0 in workspace dependencies and package section.
package.json Updated version to 1.8.0 and adjusted "postinstall" script to match the new version.

Poem

A hop to one point eight, hooray! πŸ‡
Runtime fallback leads the way.
Upstream merges join the dance,
Dependencies all get a chance.
Changelog shines with names so bright,
A rabbit’s joy in morning light! ✨🐰


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Project coverage is 92.17%. Comparing base (56e6d60) to head (bc7a60b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #145   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.17%   92.17%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        3053     3053           
=======================================
  Hits         2814     2814           
  Misses        239      239           

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed everything up to 2aa2489 in 1 minute and 34 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 47 lines of code in 3 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:12
  • Draft comment:
    Avoid using leading slashes in the include paths. Use relative paths (e.g., "src", "examples", "benches") to ensure proper packaging.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

Workflow ID: wflow_Yz7pshsqA9xZyxx4

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jun 10, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #145 will not alter performance

Comparing release-plz-2025-06-10T14-02-03Z (bc7a60b) with main (56e6d60)

Summary

βœ… 3 untouched benchmarks

@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-06-10T14-02-03Z branch 2 times, most recently from 95a9fdf to 8b2142a Compare June 10, 2025 14:20
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed 8b2142a in 1 minute and 2 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 69 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. CHANGELOG.md:10
  • Draft comment:
    Changelog entry for v1.8.0 is clear and well formatted.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
2. Cargo.toml:6
  • Draft comment:
    Version bump to 1.8.0 and associated metadata (authors, repository, docs, release profile) are correctly updated.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None
3. package.json:3
  • Draft comment:
    package.json version and postinstall script have been correctly updated to 1.8.0; configuration for NAPI targets and other metadata looks consistent.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_3XUEme1p8sZ8zvnB

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

18-19: Consistent list style
The contributors list uses *, but other lists use -. Consider converting these to - for uniform markdown style.

🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

18-18: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


19-19: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4d9421e and 8b2142a.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md

18-18: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


19-19: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: Upload coverage file
  • GitHub Check: Benchmark
  • GitHub Check: Test wasi target
  • GitHub Check: Test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (4)
Cargo.toml (1)

7-7: Confirm version bump
The package version has been correctly updated to 1.8.0, aligning with the intended release.

package.json (2)

3-3: Confirm version bump
The version field is now 1.8.0, matching Cargo.toml and the changelog.


24-24: Update postinstall script version
The postinstall script has been updated to napi-postinstall unrs-resolver 1.8.0 check, correctly reflecting the new package version.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

10-14: Approve changelog entry
The v1.8.0 release entry (2025-06-10) accurately documents the new feature and links to PR #144.

@JounQin JounQin changed the title chore: release v1.8.0 chore: release v2.0.0 Jun 11, 2025
@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-06-10T14-02-03Z branch from 8b2142a to a9314b5 Compare June 11, 2025 09:45
@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-06-10T14-02-03Z branch from a9314b5 to 52ce8f3 Compare June 11, 2025 09:45
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

22-23: Use consistent bullet style in contributor list.

Bullet points for contributors use asterisks, but the rest of the changelog uses dashes. Update to dashes to satisfy markdownlint (MD004).

- * @JounQin
- * @renovate[bot]
+ - @JounQin
+ - @renovate[bot]
🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

22-22: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


23-23: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b2142a and 52ce8f3.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
βœ… Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • Cargo.toml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
🧰 Additional context used
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md

22-22: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


23-23: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (4)
CHANGELOG.md (4)

10-11: Changelog entry for v2.0.0 is accurate.

Release header with comparison link and date is correctly formatted.


12-15: Feature section documented correctly.

The new runtime fallback capability for webcontainer is clearly described and linked.


16-19: Chore section updated appropriately.

Dependency update via renovate bot is properly logged.


20-21: Contributors section header present.

The Contributors heading is added to list the authors for this release.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed 52ce8f3 in 2 minutes and 4 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 78 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:10
  • Draft comment:
    The include paths use leading slashes (e.g. "/src") which may be treated as absolute paths. They are usually relative (e.g. "src", "examples", "benches").
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. package.json:24
  • Draft comment:
    The postinstall script now correctly uses version 2.0.0. Verify this matches your release version.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_mO9nvc58uFYiflJ1

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

@JounQin JounQin changed the title chore: release v2.0.0 chore: release v1.8.0 Jun 11, 2025
@JounQin JounQin force-pushed the release-plz-2025-06-10T14-02-03Z branch from c0e4232 to bc7a60b Compare June 11, 2025 09:52
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@JounQin
Copy link
Member Author

JounQin commented Jun 11, 2025

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 11, 2025

βœ… Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed bc7a60b in 4 minutes and 35 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 70 lines of code in 4 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. Cargo.toml:22
  • Draft comment:
    Version bump to 1.8.0 is applied consistently in this file.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative and does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions. It simply states that a version bump is applied consistently, which does not align with the rules for useful comments.
2. package.json:3
  • Draft comment:
    package.json version and postinstall script have been updated to 1.8.0 and are in sync.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative, as it only states that the package.json version and postinstall script have been updated and are in sync. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.
3. Cargo.lock:1241
  • Draft comment:
    Cargo.lock correctly reflects unrs_resolver at version 1.8.0.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely informative, stating that a file correctly reflects a version of a dependency. It does not provide any actionable feedback or suggestions for improvement.

Workflow ID: wflow_vovo7u6as7qHOOrz

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

23-24: Use consistent list style.
The contributors list uses * for bullets but the project’s style prefers -.

- * @JounQin
- * @renovate[bot]
+ - @JounQin
+ - @renovate[bot]
🧰 Tools
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

23-23: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


24-24: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 56e6d60 and bc7a60b.

β›” Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
πŸͺ› markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
CHANGELOG.md

23-23: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)


24-24: Unordered list style
Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk

(MD004, ul-style)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (6)
package.json (2)

3-3: Approve version bump.
The "version" field has been correctly updated to 1.8.0.


24-24: Approve postinstall script update.
The "postinstall" script now references 1.8.0, matching the package version.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

10-16: Approve new release entry.
The heading, date, and feature list for version 1.8.0 are correctly added and formatted.

Cargo.toml (3)

19-19: Approve workspace dependency version bump.
The workspace dependency for unrs_resolver has been updated to 1.8.0.


23-23: Approve package version bump.
The crate’s version field is correctly set to 1.8.0.


19-23:

βœ… Verification successful

Ensure Cargo.lock is updated.
The version changes in Cargo.toml require a corresponding update to Cargo.lock. Please commit the updated lock file to avoid version mismatches.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any lingering old versions in Cargo.lock
rg -n '1\.7\.13' Cargo.lock || echo "No references to 1.7.13 found."

Length of output: 100


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Confirm updated version of unrs_resolver in Cargo.lock
rg -n 'name = "unrs_resolver"' -A1 Cargo.lock || echo "unrs_resolver not found in Cargo.lock"

Length of output: 98


Cargo.lock is Up-to-Date

Confirmed that unrs_resolver is listed at version 1.8.0 in Cargo.lock and there are no lingering references to the previous 1.7.13 version. No further changes are needed here.

@JounQin JounQin merged commit 46cbe4d into main Jun 11, 2025
23 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the release-plz-2025-06-10T14-02-03Z branch June 11, 2025 10:02
Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! πŸ‘

Reviewed 9065adc in 14 minutes and 7 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 57 lines of code in 3 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž to teach Ellipsis.
1. CHANGELOG.md:10
  • Draft comment:
    Version inconsistency: changelog now shows 1.8.0 but release notes and breaking changes imply a 2.0.0 bump.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment looked like it was already resolved.
2. Cargo.toml:23
  • Draft comment:
    Version in Cargo.toml is set to 1.8.0 despite documented API breaking changes that suggest a major (2.0.0) release.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While downgrading from 2.0.0 to 1.8.0 might seem unusual, I don't have any evidence of the "documented API breaking changes" the comment refers to. The comment makes an assertion without providing proof. Following semver, going from 2.0.0 to 1.8.0 would be unusual, but without seeing the actual API changes or documentation, I can't verify this claim. I might be too strict in requiring evidence - perhaps the reviewer has access to documentation or commit history that shows the breaking changes that I can't see. Even if there are breaking changes documented elsewhere, a version change requires careful consideration of the full context. Without that context in the PR, this comment isn't actionable enough. The comment should be deleted as it makes claims about API breaking changes without providing evidence within the context of the PR review.
3. package.json:3
  • Draft comment:
    Ensure version consistency: package.json uses 1.8.0 while release details mention v2.0.0 with breaking changes.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The author deliberately changed the version from 2.0.0 to 1.8.0 in multiple places, suggesting this was intentional. Without seeing the release details mentioned in the comment, I can't verify if there's actually an inconsistency. Version changes could be for many valid reasons like rolling back a release or fixing a versioning mistake. The comment might be correct - there could be release notes or git tags showing 2.0.0 is the correct version. The deliberate change in multiple places could be a mistake. Without seeing the release details mentioned, we don't have strong evidence that this is incorrect. The systematic change in multiple places suggests intentionality. Delete this comment as we don't have strong evidence of an issue, and version changes are often intentional for valid reasons.

Workflow ID: wflow_BpREyWF0ZIeR8rVL

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants