Replies: 0 comments 2 replies
-
This can work, but gut feeling says it can be exploitable, I just need to figure out how. The question is, do you need this researched now? Shall we first get treasury/traction before figuring out how to spend it :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Definitions
collateral treasury
- where we store the Proxy Yield Aggregator yields.On-Swap Top-Up Strategy
Leveraging transfer hooks, we:
Optimization (Removal of Single Sided Liquidity)
I wonder if we should remove some uAD liquidity to make it less burdensome on our collateral treasury balance?
A. Should this ratio be 1:1 e.g. we remove 1 uAD and add 1 3CRV during this topup?
B. Should we make this ratio dynamic based on the amount of 3CRV market liquidity compared to collateral treasury?
100000 'extra' uAD in market
('extra' meaning that if we remove all of this, then the price will be 1.00) :1000 3CRV in collateral treasury
calculation is (100000/100=100
) yields withdrawal of100 uAD
and deposit of1 3CRV
?C. What's the optimal formula?
This way, instead of a burn disincentive there is just a higher gas fee disincentive to sell.
Further Ramblings
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions