Filter combining inconsistency between blockers

[peace2000]

I have noticed that there is an inconsistency between blockers when combining filters with a comma.

Adblock Plus, Adguard and uBlock Origin treat filters like this differently:

iltalehti.fi#?#main div[class="card "], main .half-article:-abp-contains(Kaupallinen yhteistyö)

ABP & uBO way to interpret:

iltalehti.fi#?#main div[class="card "]:-abp-contains(Kaupallinen yhteistyö)
iltalehti.fi#?#main .half-article:-abp-contains(Kaupallinen yhteistyö)

AG way to interpret:
iltalehti.fi#?#main div[class="card "]
iltalehti.fi#?#main .half-article:-abp-contains(Kaupallinen yhteistyö)

I'm not aware of any common place to discuss stuff like this so I'm opening an issue report here, and I'll tag representatives from each "section": @gorhill @ameshkov @WebReflection

What I'm trying to say is that could you consider doing some alignment/agreeing together how rules like that should be interpret so that it's interpret in the same way in all blockers? For those who try to maintain cross-blocker compatible filterlists, inconsistencies in interpretation are not a good thing.

Page where I tested filter interpretation: https://www.iltalehti.fi/raha

[gwarser]

#382 (comment)

---

Actually this one issue was linked from wiki #453 it's about comma-separated procedurals, not only :style().

[gorhill]

I'm not aware of any common place to discuss stuff like this

Please open a discussion about this, I want the issue tracker to be kept for actionable items.