Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Project maintainer lacks commitment to project #43

Open
tonysimpson opened this issue Jun 26, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Project maintainer lacks commitment to project #43

tonysimpson opened this issue Jun 26, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@tonysimpson
Copy link
Owner

Filling this issue against myself :)

A new maintainer is required for the nanomsg-python project as the current maintainer has no motivation to do so.

I still feel that nanomsg is a promising design but at this time I don't have any projects I will be using it on.

If you would like to take over as maintainer please raise a pull request which:

  • references this issue;
  • updates the documentation and setup.py to reflect the new location of the repo and maintainer;
  • has some details of why you are motivated to maintain the project, how you are qualified and what you would like to improve, just a few bullet points will do.

Thanks all and sorry that I haven't been able to prioritize nanomsg-python myself.

@vac
Copy link

vac commented Feb 10, 2016

Well done @tonysimpson!
It's not bad! I'm using your implementation in few projects, in production.
nanomsg-python BUS is working fine, on Linux and Windows.
In github space it's difficult to drop the project.
If someone's fork is developed enough then I think it will be the right time to swap maintainer.
Now, a year after your issue I see that you are still doing more in nanomsg+python than anyone else 👍
So don't be sorry and be proud - you wont be forgotten.
Live long and prosper!

@tonysimpson
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks, feedback much appreciated - glad to hear its working for you in productions.

@chiradip
Copy link

chiradip commented Mar 7, 2016

I am tempted to take the responsibility but need to sort out my responsibilities. I almost replaced ZeroMQ by nanomsg in one of my big products. You did a great job - please do not abandon it before somebody volunteers to be the new maintainer.

@aphor
Copy link

aphor commented Mar 30, 2016

SaltStack is experiencing some growing pains WRT 0MQ. I don't really know enough about the 0mq failure modes in their massive-scaled clients, but since they've decided to try and abstract transports, I found nanomsg interesting. Maybe there is a future?

@thatch45
Copy link

While I really like the nanomsg project, the approach that we have taken for SaltStack is to implement the queuing networking system ourselves in python and using tornado coroutines. This approach is much harder than just using 0MQ but it has allowed us to optimize the communication for our specific needs and makes it easier to view the whole stack.
If anyone is interested in building a nanomsg transport for Salt I would be happy to point them in the right direction.

@omani
Copy link

omani commented Nov 14, 2016

Please do not stop to maintain this. Really appreciated!!!

@dsoprea dsoprea mentioned this issue Jan 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants