Subclasses UITableViewCells don't receive reuse identifier, and are not reused

[tbrannam]

The ISSViewHierarchyParser treats subclasses of UITableViewCell as a custom view type, and therefore does not call the designated initializer -initWithStyle:reuseIdentifier: -- as a side effect - the UITableView's dequeueReusableCellWithIdentifier: is not able to recycled Subclassed UITableViewCells.

The Sample's PrototypeExampleCell exhibits this behavior.

[tbrannam]

One suggestion I could make is to require the XML markup to use the general use tags of tableviewcell, but include a xml attribute to indicate the ObjC classname to use.

Additionally or alternatively it might be useful to allowing the default mapping from the elements to a Concrete class as a base configuration - perhaps this could be contained in options passed to the ISSViewBuilder? Or an external mapping?

For example, a plist containing - such that the custom class will be created by default, and fallback to the built in types?
@{@"tableviewcell" : @"PrototypeExampleCell",
@"tableview": @"MyCustomTableView"}

[tbrannam]

Pull request #9 does not address custom class mapping,

[tbrannam]

This has been working very well - although since tagToClass in internal to ISSViewHierachyParser, my XML becomes very un-DRY

        <label class="I number"  impl="TTTAttributedLabel"/>
        <label class="II number" impl="TTTAttributedLabel"/>
        <label class="III number"  impl="TTTAttributedLabel"/>
        <label class="IV number" impl="TTTAttributedLabel"/>
        <label class="V number" impl="TTTAttributedLabel"/>

It would be good to allow applications to override the default implementation class at application startup.

[tolo]

Added initial support for this, by exposing the method elementNameToViewClass in ISSViewHierarchyParser (see 649fbda).

Note though that it also is possible to specify the implementation class via the XML element name, i.e.:

<TTTAttributedLabel class="I number"/>