Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xgboost and categorical predictors #830

Open
topepo opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

xgboost and categorical predictors #830

topepo opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@topepo
Copy link
Member

topepo commented Oct 18, 2022

There is an experimental argument for categorical variables.

We need a process to potentially adopt this and how we should handle

  • backward compatability
  • changes to parsnip:::as_xgb_data() since some new xgboost options are required for this.
@topepo topepo added the feature a feature request or enhancement label Oct 18, 2022
@EmilHvitfeldt
Copy link
Member

@exsell-jc
Copy link

I thought I created an issue about this, but I might be wrong -- might've been in a wrong repository.
It would be really nice if this gets implemented.

@simonpcouch
Copy link
Contributor

Related to #1087. Once the xgboost team starts moving toward an R release of xgboost 2 we can do a push on supporting those new features and interfaces!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants