Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] MOS results #20

Open
kwanUm opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

[Question] MOS results #20

kwanUm opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@kwanUm
Copy link

kwanUm commented Aug 5, 2020

Something looks strange at the MOS table presented in the paper. The WaveGlow score is 4.57 ± 0.04 and is only 0.05 lower than GroundTruth. Did anyone understand why?

The samples shared for SqueezeWave are also of lower quality than expected, sounding a bit robotic even at the 128L model. The WaveGlow results shared by NVIDIA sounds much better to me.

@wj-gxy
Copy link

wj-gxy commented Jul 15, 2024

Yes, this model can't be trained by yourself at all.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants