Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix py3k regression in 0.8.3 #131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2016
Merged

Fix py3k regression in 0.8.3 #131

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2016

Conversation

jimbobhickville
Copy link
Contributor

.items() works in both. This dictionary won't ever be especially large,
so the performance hit for not using an iterator in py27 is negligible.

If you really want, I can pull in six.iteritems() but I didn't see any other uses of six so I didn't want to introduce a new dependency.

.items() works in both.  This dictionary won't ever be especially large,
so the performance hit for not using an iterator in py27 is negligible.
@jimbobhickville
Copy link
Contributor Author

If this is good to go, can we get a 0.8.4 as well? Thanks.

@solarkennedy
Copy link
Contributor

Looks fine, the tests are passing. If you are interested in python 3 compat you might be interested in #80 because I think we are not running python3 tests... :(

@solarkennedy solarkennedy merged commit 30e69f4 into thefactory:master Jul 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants