Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource: azurerm_service_fabric_mesh_application #6761

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Oct 2, 2020

Conversation

mbfrahry
Copy link
Member

@mbfrahry mbfrahry commented May 5, 2020

Partially addresses #2486

@ghost ghost added the documentation label May 5, 2020
@mbfrahry mbfrahry changed the title [WIP] New Resource: azurerm_service_fabric_mesh_application New Resource: azurerm_service_fabric_mesh_application Jul 10, 2020
@mbfrahry mbfrahry requested a review from a team July 10, 2020 17:17
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @mbfrahry, thanks for the PR.

Overall looks great however i think it might make sense to include it in the servicefabric package instead of creating a new one? And does this make sense to release without the API returning the service value?

Comment on lines 233 to 236
/* This does not currently return from the api
if err := d.Set("service", flattenServiceFabricMeshApplicationServices(resp.Services)); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("setting `service`: %+v", err)
}*/
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be commented out?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It should. These attributes aren't returned from the api at the moment.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like this might be available using the ServicesClient?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Boom, that's it. Thank you @jackofallops!

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.19.0 milestone Jul 14, 2020
@jackofallops jackofallops modified the milestones: v2.19.0, v2.20.0, v2.21.0 Jul 16, 2020
@katbyte katbyte modified the milestones: v2.21.0, v2.22.0, v2.23.0 Jul 31, 2020
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff removed this from the v2.23.0 milestone Aug 13, 2020
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: v2.24.0, v2.25.0 Aug 13, 2020
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: v2.25.0, v2.26.0 Aug 27, 2020
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: v2.26.0, v2.27.0 Sep 3, 2020
@jackofallops jackofallops modified the milestones: v2.27.0, v2.28.0, v2.29.0 Sep 10, 2020
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: v2.29.0, v2.30.0 Sep 24, 2020
@mbfrahry
Copy link
Member Author

This is ready for another review @katbyte @jackofallops

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: v2.30.0, v2.31.0 Oct 1, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from one comment LGTM 👍

}
}

// nolint: deadcode unused
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this till required?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nerp! Removed!

@mbfrahry mbfrahry merged commit 3e637f5 into master Oct 2, 2020
@mbfrahry mbfrahry deleted the f-service-fabric-mesh-application branch October 2, 2020 21:23
mbfrahry added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 8, 2020

This has been released in version 2.31.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.31.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 2, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants