Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_iot_time_series_insights_reference_data_set - Add ForceNew to key_property and data_string_comparison_behavior #10343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2021

Conversation

mbfrahry
Copy link
Member

Fixes TestAccIoTTimeSeriesInsightsReferenceDataSet_update

--- PASS: TestAccIoTTimeSeriesInsightsReferenceDataSet_update (285.17s)

Copy link
Contributor

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

Tests pass:

Screenshot 2021-01-28 at 10 39 10

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff merged commit 961a035 into master Jan 28, 2021
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff deleted the b-iottimeseriesinsights-reference-dataset branch January 28, 2021 09:41
tombuildsstuff added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 28, 2021

This has been released in version 2.45.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.45.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 27, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 27, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants