Skip to content

Conversation

bryantbiggs
Copy link
Member

Description

  • Correct IAM statement condition variable type

Motivation and Context

Breaking Changes

  • No

How Has This Been Tested?

  • I have updated at least one of the examples/* to demonstrate and validate my change(s)
  • I have tested and validated these changes using one or more of the provided examples/* projects
  • I have executed pre-commit run -a on my pull request

@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs requested a review from antonbabenko July 11, 2025 19:31
@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs merged commit 27e9114 into master Jul 11, 2025
12 checks passed
@bryantbiggs bryantbiggs deleted the fix/iam-statement-condition branch July 11, 2025 20:13
antonbabenko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2025
## [6.0.5](v6.0.4...v6.0.5) (2025-07-11)

### Bug Fixes

* Correct IAM statement `condition` variable type ([#315](#315)) ([27e9114](27e9114))
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

This PR is included in version 6.0.5 🎉

dispel-derekberger pushed a commit to dispel/terraform-aws-ecs that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2025
dispel-derekberger pushed a commit to dispel/terraform-aws-ecs that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 11, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistent conditional result types in task_exec_iam_statements for the IAM condition

2 participants