You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1) we do try to generalize, and say that a wavefunction for n particles will look something like $f(z)e^{something}$
2) we _insist_ that the wavefunction be in the lowest landau level (lll) it can possibly be: there are no other landau levels it can fall back on.
{/**
* TODO: Why does the WF being in the lowest landau level entail that f(z) must be analytic?
* labels: expansion
*/}
this is rather strong. This leads to the claim that $f(z)$ _must_ be analytic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://github.com/ThomasFKJorna/thesis-writing/blob/e51023451325d184f4235d26fef02820334084ef/Chapters/III. Anyons/4. The Quantum Hall Effect.md#L248
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: