java22 pom variant
#175
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Yes I get this, but would it not be better to cap it at java 21, instead of 22 as per what I have seen everything works well with 21. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
@tcheeric
hi, eric. per your interest/usefulness, a nostr-java java22 pom variant exists. changes were limited to 7 lines in the parent pom.
the variant builds and tests without issue here, as well as 100% functioning with SuperConductor upgrade to virtual threads (java 21+)).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions