-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mapping between Test262 and web-features #4043
Comments
For ecmascript features, could web-features just reuse the same name as in test262? Test262 tests are written before that implementations ship, so the identifier should always be available when you'll want to include it in web-features. |
I think we could a lot of the time, but not always. Our identifiers cannot have periods, and we might have larger groupings. For example, we have "array-flat" where Test262 has "Array.prototype.flat" + "Array.prototype.flatMap". |
IIUC, there’s a few separate requests here, and it’s worth considering them separately:
The biggest missing piece that affects the tc39/test262 project seems to be the first item. Everything else can be built on top of that. |
With https://github.com/bocoup/test262-stream, the first step is trivial: await new Test262Stream("./test262")
.filter(test => test.attrs.features?.includes("Array.prototype.flat"))
.map(test => test.file)
.toArray(); |
TIL about test262-stream — that makes that part easier indeed: import {default as Test262Stream} from 'test262-stream';
const stream = new Test262Stream('../test262');
const featureIdentifierToTests = new Map();
for await (const test of stream) {
const filePath = test.file;
if (!test.attrs.features) continue;
for (const feature of test.attrs.features) {
if (featureIdentifierToTests.has(feature)) {
featureIdentifierToTests.get(feature).add(filePath);
} else {
featureIdentifierToTests.set(feature, new Set([filePath]));
}
}
}
console.log(featureIdentifierToTests); Example output:Map(169) { // … 'Array.prototype.flat' => Set(15) { 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/methods-called-as-functions.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/array-like-objects.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/bound-function-call.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/empty-array-elements.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/empty-object-elements.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/length.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/name.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/non-numeric-depth-should-not-throw.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/non-object-ctor-throws.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/null-undefined-elements.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/null-undefined-input-throws.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/positive-infinity.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/prop-desc.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/proxy-access-count.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flat/symbol-object-create-null-depth-throws.js' }, 'Array.prototype.flatMap' => Set(20) { 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/methods-called-as-functions.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/array-like-objects-nested.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/array-like-objects-poisoned-length.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/array-like-objects-typedarrays.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/array-like-objects.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/bound-function-argument.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/length.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/depth-always-one.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/name.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/non-callable-argument-throws.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/not-a-constructor.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/prop-desc.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/proxy-access-count.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/this-value-ctor-non-object.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/this-value-ctor-object-species-bad-throws.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/this-value-ctor-object-species-custom-ctor-poisoned-throws.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/this-value-ctor-object-species-custom-ctor.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/this-value-ctor-object-species.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/this-value-null-undefined-throws.js', 'test/built-ins/Array/prototype/flatMap/thisArg-argument.js' }, // … } |
That's very nice! It look like I still need a Test262 checkout, so a build step to create these mappings as build artifacts would be great. In WPT we do this as artifacts published for every merged PR. Example: |
Why can't your identifiers have periods? |
That's a self-imposed limitation that we never discussed much, but it's the style of caniuse identifiers and we do want web-features to mix well with caniuse. |
@foolip https://caniuse.com/?search=array.prototype.flat seems to work just fine. |
https://caniuse.com/?search=flatten also works, but the canonical URL is https://caniuse.com/array-flat, with the identifier "array-flat" coming from this file: |
Let's find a way to find the tests for a given web-features identifier in Test262!
Background:
web-features is an effort to describe the whole web platform, including JavaScript, as a set of features. It's part of Baseline, which powers the "Baseline 2022" badge at the top of MDN pages, such as on Array.prototype.at().
Separately from Baseline, we have a mechanism for finding the tests in web-platform-tests that belong to a particular feature:
https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-transforms?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=feature%3Atransforms3d
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-transforms/WEB_FEATURES.yml
Alternatives:
Test262 already has a features.txt, so rather than mapping web-features to individual tests we should map to one of those features. There are two obvious options:
test262
field to web-features accepting one or more Test262 feature identifiersWith one of these in place, it should be possible to list all tests for a given JavaScript features in web-features. This would help web-features maintainers understand the level of interoperability when determining the Baseline status of JavaScript features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: