You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the Nov 2018 breakout session, we thought it might be valuable for stage 3 reviewers to have guidelines for what to consider during review. We could encourage them to consider security by including it in the guidelines. @natashenka has offered to put together a PR for the process document that would include this section, then present it to the committee at a future meeting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This sounds like a great addition to tc39/process-document#18 :-D "Security" could be one of the risk areas defined at an early stage, that's evaluated as part of stage 3.
At the Nov 2018 breakout session, we thought it might be valuable for stage 3 reviewers to have guidelines for what to consider during review. We could encourage them to consider security by including it in the guidelines. @natashenka has offered to put together a PR for the process document that would include this section, then present it to the committee at a future meeting.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: