You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+2-1Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -46,4 +46,5 @@ I would actually like to specify this like the JSC one. It's simpler. Similarly,
46
46
47
47
## Related Work
48
48
49
-
- The [Error Stacks](https://github.com/mgaudet/proposal-error-capturestacktrace) proposal is largely an orthogonal one to this, but it would provide framework and text to talk about stack strings, as mostly the current spec doesn't really talk about stacks. However, for this proposal I'd argue we don't need to specify the contents of stack strings.
49
+
- The [Error Stacks](https://github.com/mgaudet/proposal-error-capturestacktrace) proposal is largely an orthogonal one to this, but it would provide framework and text to talk about stack strings, as mostly the current spec doesn't really talk about stacks. However, for this proposal I'd argue we don't need to specify the contents of stack strings.
50
+
- The [Error Stack Accessor](https://github.com/ljharb/proposal-error-stack-accessor/) proposal could be the other route by which the spec starts to talk about stacks.
0 commit comments