Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 25, 2022. It is now read-only.

Clean up wording: separation of atomic and non-atomic accesses #99

Closed
lars-t-hansen opened this issue May 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Clean up wording: separation of atomic and non-atomic accesses #99

lars-t-hansen opened this issue May 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
Memory model
Milestone
Stage 3

Comments

@lars-t-hansen
Copy link
Collaborator

In this comment and a preceding comment there is some discussion of the wording of the memory model and how/whether it properly orders atomic and non-atomic accesses.

Need to check this.
@lars-t-hansen lars-t-hansen added this to the Stage 3 milestone May 10, 2016
@lars-t-hansen lars-t-hansen changed the title Clean up wording: separation Clean up wording: separation of atomic and non-atomic accesses May 12, 2016
@lars-t-hansen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fixed by today's draft.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Memory model
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Stage 3
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lars-t-hansen