We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The Builder.py has hardcoded archiver+flags and ranlib implementation:
Builder.py
link_cmd = "ar -rcs " + lib + " " + link_cmd + " \n ranlib " + lib
that makes imposible to use other implementation of them, e.g. on built of StringiFor.
Is it possible to add optional passing of ar_cmd and ranlib_cmd to pass e.g. llvm-ar and llvm-ranlib executables as string parameter?
ranlib_cmd
llvm-ar
llvm-ranlib
Maybe it could be the additional options for custom as compiler -fc like -ar my_ar ar_flags and -rl my_ranlib?
custom
-fc
-ar my_ar ar_flags
-rl my_ranlib
Although the llvm fortran compiler has no own driver and use external compiler to produce executable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The
Builder.pyhas hardcoded archiver+flags and ranlib implementation:that makes imposible to use other implementation of them, e.g. on built of StringiFor.
Is it possible to add optional passing of ar_cmd and
ranlib_cmdto pass e.g.llvm-arandllvm-ranlibexecutables as string parameter?Maybe it could be the additional options for
customas compiler-fclike-ar my_ar ar_flagsand-rl my_ranlib?Although the llvm fortran compiler has no own driver and use external compiler to produce executable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: