Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Value of a single item calculated by quantity #476

Open
1 of 3 tasks
ian1edwards opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Value of a single item calculated by quantity #476

ian1edwards opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
⬆️ enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ian1edwards
Copy link

ian1edwards commented Jan 15, 2025

What is the problem you are trying to solve with this feature?

Currently when you assign a value to an item if you also assign a quantity it assumes that the value is for the total, not each item. This seems counterintuitive. For example:

I am storing 10 widgets inside a box that are all the same and are not serialized but are otherwise identical (this seems to be the only use case for a quantity field). Each widget is worth $100. If I enter qty 10 and then assign a value of $100 to the item, the total value is calculated as $100 rather than $1000.

What is the solution you are proposing?

Calculating the value of a given item using the quantity field as a consideration.

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

Additional context

No response

Contributions

  • I have searched through existing issues and feature requests to see if my idea has already been proposed.
  • If this feature is accepted, I would be willing to help implement and maintain this feature.
  • If this feature is accepted, I'm willing to sponsor the development of this feature.
@ian1edwards ian1edwards added the ⬆️ enhancement New feature or request label Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⬆️ enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant