You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the problem you are trying to solve with this feature?
Currently when you assign a value to an item if you also assign a quantity it assumes that the value is for the total, not each item. This seems counterintuitive. For example:
I am storing 10 widgets inside a box that are all the same and are not serialized but are otherwise identical (this seems to be the only use case for a quantity field). Each widget is worth $100. If I enter qty 10 and then assign a value of $100 to the item, the total value is calculated as $100 rather than $1000.
What is the solution you are proposing?
Calculating the value of a given item using the quantity field as a consideration.
What alternatives have you considered?
No response
Additional context
No response
Contributions
I have searched through existing issues and feature requests to see if my idea has already been proposed.
If this feature is accepted, I would be willing to help implement and maintain this feature.
If this feature is accepted, I'm willing to sponsor the development of this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the problem you are trying to solve with this feature?
Currently when you assign a value to an item if you also assign a quantity it assumes that the value is for the total, not each item. This seems counterintuitive. For example:
I am storing 10 widgets inside a box that are all the same and are not serialized but are otherwise identical (this seems to be the only use case for a quantity field). Each widget is worth $100. If I enter qty 10 and then assign a value of $100 to the item, the total value is calculated as $100 rather than $1000.
What is the solution you are proposing?
Calculating the value of a given item using the quantity field as a consideration.
What alternatives have you considered?
No response
Additional context
No response
Contributions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: