You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment, the fairness scorer compares the distribution of a variable in a sensitive sub-group to the overall distribution. This works well for symmetrical statistical distance metrics, but it would be useful to have a way of using asymmetrical metrics such as disparate impact, to produce a similar table comparing distributions of different pairings of subgroups instead.
Describe the solution you would like
A method similar to fairlens.FairnessScorer.distribution_score, which iterates through pairs of the subgroups instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there an existing issue for this?
Is your feature request related to a problem?
At the moment, the fairness scorer compares the distribution of a variable in a sensitive sub-group to the overall distribution. This works well for symmetrical statistical distance metrics, but it would be useful to have a way of using asymmetrical metrics such as disparate impact, to produce a similar table comparing distributions of different pairings of subgroups instead.
Describe the solution you would like
A method similar to
fairlens.FairnessScorer.distribution_score
, which iterates through pairs of the subgroups instead.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: