You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note that tab is more consistent. Especially around the 1st and 10th mark of incrementally numbered items. And the 100th, 1kth, 10kth items. Whereas one will always be staggered. It’s probably most common to have lists between 1-99 items, hence I deem that most important.
This is mostly noticeable when trying to indent further lines: they have to match the items “bullet” \d+[\.)]\ {1,4}.
Still, one seems to be used more? So probably good to switch the default output format to that?
Alternatives
stay as is
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From how I've seen people write markdown, I've almost never seen them use tab, and I personally always set it to one too. That's of course a small sample size but my two cents is that this change makes sense.
Initial checklist
Problem
While
one
is used more by authors, historically there have been problems when using it across parsers, hence why the default istab
.Solution
To illustrate,
one
:tab
:Note that
tab
is more consistent. Especially around the 1st and 10th mark of incrementally numbered items. And the 100th, 1kth, 10kth items. Whereasone
will always be staggered. It’s probably most common to have lists between 1-99 items, hence I deem that most important.This is mostly noticeable when trying to indent further lines: they have to match the items “bullet”
\d+[\.)]\ {1,4}
.Still,
one
seems to be used more? So probably good to switch the default output format to that?Alternatives
stay as is
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: