Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(analytics): use Scarf.js to provide anonymized installation analytics #5259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

char0n
Copy link
Member

@char0n char0n commented Nov 6, 2024

Anonymized analytics

Swagger Editor uses Scarf to collect anonymized installation analytics. These analytics help support the maintainers of this library and ONLY run during installation. To opt out, you can set the scarfSettings.enabled field to false in your project's package.json:

// package.json
{
  // ...
  "scarfSettings": {
    "enabled": false
  }
  // ...
}

Alternatively, you can set the environment variable SCARF_ANALYTICS to false as part of the environment that installs your npm packages, e.g., SCARF_ANALYTICS=false npm install.

@char0n char0n changed the title feat: use Scarf.js to provide anonymized installation analytics feat(analytics): use Scarf.js to provide anonymized installation analytics Nov 6, 2024
@char0n char0n requested a review from ponelat November 6, 2024 10:29
@char0n char0n self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
@char0n char0n merged commit 7450c2e into next Nov 6, 2024
4 checks passed
@char0n char0n deleted the char0n/telemetry branch November 6, 2024 10:38
swagger-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2024
# [5.0.0-alpha.97](v5.0.0-alpha.96...v5.0.0-alpha.97) (2024-11-06)

### Features

* **analytics:** use Scarf.js to provide anonymized installation analytics ([#5259](#5259)) ([7450c2e](7450c2e))
@swagger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.0.0-alpha.97 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants