Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option modelPropertyNaming to javascript generator #8086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2018
Merged

Add option modelPropertyNaming to javascript generator #8086

merged 1 commit into from
May 25, 2018

Conversation

stianlik
Copy link
Contributor

@stianlik stianlik commented Apr 27, 2018

Fixes 6530.

PR checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines.
  • Ran the shell script under ./bin/ to update Petstore sample so that CIs can verify the change. (For instance, only need to run ./bin/{LANG}-petstore.sh and ./bin/security/{LANG}-petstore.sh if updating the {LANG} (e.g. php, ruby, python, etc) code generator or {LANG} client's mustache templates). Windows batch files can be found in .\bin\windows\. not relevant for this change — did not commit petstore sample
  • Filed the PR against the correct branch: 3.0.0 branch for changes related to OpenAPI spec 3.0. Default: master.
  • Copied the technical committee to review the pull request if your PR is targeting a particular programming language.

Description of the PR

Add option modelPropertyNaming to JavascriptClientCodegen to support different naming conventions for properties. See issue #6530

@CodeNinjai @frol @cliffano

@frol
Copy link
Contributor

frol commented Apr 27, 2018

LGTM! Well done!

@stianlik
Copy link
Contributor Author

@frol is there anything else I need to do to get this merged?

@frol
Copy link
Contributor

frol commented May 25, 2018

I have no permissions to merge it, but it looks good to me.

@HugoMario
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @stianlik !!
I reviewed the CI's error but they don't seem to be related to these changes.

@itabrezshaikh
Copy link

Great work! Thanks

This was referenced Mar 11, 2021
This was referenced Mar 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants