Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix README #46

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2022
Merged

Fix README #46

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2022

Conversation

mblue9
Copy link
Collaborator

@mblue9 mblue9 commented Jul 25, 2022

Have updated README here, was out of sync with vignette so stemangiola/tidybulk#169 would help here too.

@mblue9
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mblue9 commented Jul 26, 2022

Do you need me to change anything here to merge? As merging this would fix the old info in the readme like Bioconductor under submission

Comment on lines -187 to -211
my_theme
```

# Quality control

We can quality control for each sample in an intuitive way using nest function and Bioconductor utilities

```{r}

location <- mapIds(
EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86,
keys=rownames(pbmc_small_polished),
column="SEQNAME",
keytype="SYMBOL"
)

counts_mito =
pbmc_small_polished %>%

nest(data = -sample) %>%
mutate(data = map(
data,
~ .x %>%

# Join mitochondrion statistics
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am a bit confused if these changes fix the figure, how come there is a bunch of code that was deleted?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So when I tried to render the README.Rmd to update the README.md it kept erroring (e.g. with EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86) and I saw that there was code in it that wasn't in the Introduction vignette. The README looked like it was older than the Introduction vignette so I replaced it with the Introduction code. The README code is now an exact copy of what's in the Introduction Rmd, should it be?

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So when I tried to render the README.Rmd to update the README.md it kept erroring (e.g. with EnsDb.Hsapiens.v86) and I saw that there was code in it that wasn't in the Introduction vignette. The README looked like it was older than the Introduction vignette so I replaced it with the Introduction code. The README code is now an exact copy of what's in the Introduction Rmd, should it be?

Amazing!

@stemangiola stemangiola merged commit 2bc6a5e into master Jul 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants