paper.bib

@book{Wohlin:2012:ESE:2349018,
 author = {Wohlin, Claes and Runeson, Per and Hst, Martin and Ohlsson, Magnus C. and Regnell, Bjrn and Wessln, Anders},
 title = {Experimentation in Software Engineering},
 year = {2012},
 isbn = {3642290434, 9783642290435},
 publisher = {Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated},
} 

@article{Glass:1994:SC:624604.625401,
 author = {Glass, Robert L.},
 title = {The Software-Research Crisis},
 journal = {IEEE Softw.},
 issue_date = {November 1994},
 volume = {11},
 number = {6},
 month = nov,
 year = {1994},
 issn = {0740-7459},
 pages = {42--47},
 numpages = {6},
 url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/52.329400},
 doi = {10.1109/52.329400},
 acmid = {625401},
 publisher = {IEEE Computer Society Press},
 address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
 keywords = {computer software, mathematics, research model, software engineering, software practice, software-research crisis, technological forecasting},
} 

@ARTICLE{159342,
author={},
journal={IEEE Std 610.12-1990},
title={{IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology}},
year={1990},
volume={},
number={},
pages={1-84},
keywords={glossaries;software engineering;standards;IEEE Std 610.12-1990;standard glossary;software engineering terminology;Terminology;Software engineering;Standards;glossary;terminology;dictionary;Software engineering;Definitions},
doi={10.1109/IEEESTD.1990.101064},
ISSN={},
month={Dec},}

@book{deming2000out,
  title={Out of the Crisis},
  author={Deming, W.E.},
  isbn={9780262541152},
  lccn={2001268898},
  series={Mit Press},
  year={2000},
  publisher={Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study}
}

@book{robson2002real,
  title={Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers},
  author={Robson, C.},
  isbn={9780631213055},
  lccn={92021782},
  series={Regional Surveys of the World Series},
  year={2002},
  publisher={Wiley}
}

@book{goodwin2009research,
  title={Research In Psychology: Methods and Design},
  author={Goodwin, C.J.},
  isbn={9780470522783},
  lccn={2009014320},
  year={2009},
  publisher={John Wiley \& Sons}
}

@InProceedings{10-1007-3-540-57092-6-91,
author="Basili, Victor R.",
editor="Rombach, H. Dieter
and Basili, Victor R.
and Selby, Richard W.",
title="The experimental paradigm in software engineering",
booktitle="Experimental Software Engineering Issues: Critical Assessment and Future Directions",
year="1993",
publisher="Springer Berlin Heidelberg",
address="Berlin, Heidelberg",
pages="1--12",
isbn="978-3-540-47903-1"
}

@ARTICLE{6312975,
author={V. R. {Basili} and R. W. {Selby} and D. H. {Hutchens}},
journal={IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering},
title={Experimentation in software engineering},
year={1986},
volume={SE-12},
number={7},
pages={733-743},
keywords={software engineering;software engineering;experimental process;Software;Testing;Software engineering;Measurement;Educational institutions;Programming;Debugging;Controlled experiment;data collection and analysis;empirical study;experimental design;software metrics;software technology measurement and evaluation},
doi={10.1109/TSE.1986.6312975},
ISSN={0098-5589},
month={July},}

@ARTICLE{300094,
author={N. {Fenton} and S. L. {Pfleeger} and R. L. {Glass}},
journal={IEEE Software},
title={Science and substance: a challenge to software engineers},
year={1994},
volume={11},
number={4},
pages={86-95},
keywords={software engineering;software maintenance;software engineers;software researchers;software development;software maintenance;new practices;effectiveness;software community;scientific methodologies;Software engineering;Standards development;Software standards;Documentation;Technology management;Software maintenance;Productivity;Object oriented programming;Computer aided software engineering;Process control},
doi={10.1109/52.300094},
ISSN={0740-7459},
month={July},}

@article{Kitchenham:1995:CSM:624608.625491,
 author = {Kitchenham, Barbara and Pickard, Lesley and Pfleeger, Shari Lawrence},
 title = {Case Studies for Method and Tool Evaluation},
 journal = {IEEE Softw.},
 issue_date = {July 1995},
 volume = {12},
 number = {4},
 month = jul,
 year = {1995},
 issn = {0740-7459},
 pages = {52--62},
 numpages = {11},
 url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/52.391832},
 doi = {10.1109/52.391832},
 acmid = {625491},
 publisher = {IEEE Computer Society Press},
 address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
} 

@article{Potts:1993:SRR:624601.625327,
 author = {Potts, Colin},
 title = {Software-Engineering Research Revisited},
 journal = {IEEE Softw.},
 issue_date = {September 1993},
 volume = {10},
 number = {5},
 month = sep,
 year = {1993},
 issn = {0740-7459},
 pages = {19--28},
 numpages = {10},
 url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/52.232392},
 doi = {10.1109/52.232392},
 acmid = {625327},
 publisher = {IEEE Computer Society Press},
 address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
 keywords = {case studies, contextual issues, industrial projects, industry-as-laboratory approach, software engineering},
}

@article{Tichy:1998:CSE:619029.620983,
 author = {Tichy, Walter F.},
 title = {Should Computer Scientists Experiment More?},
 journal = {Computer},
 issue_date = {May 1998},
 volume = {31},
 number = {5},
 month = may,
 year = {1998},
 issn = {0018-9162},
 pages = {32--40},
 numpages = {9},
 url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.675631},
 doi = {10.1109/2.675631},
 acmid = {620983},
 publisher = {IEEE Computer Society Press},
 address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA},
} 

@book{anastas2000research,
  title={Research Design for Social Work and the Human Services},
  author={Anastas, J.W.},
  isbn={9780231529280},
  year={2000},
  publisher={Columbia University Press}
}

@book{fink2003survey,
  title={The survey handbook},
  author={Fink, Arlene},
  year={2003},
  publisher={Sage}
}

@ARTICLE{675630,
author={M. V. {Zelkowitz} and D. R. {Wallace}},
journal={Computer},
title={Experimental models for validating technology},
year={1998},
volume={31},
number={5},
pages={23-31},
keywords={software engineering;product development;experimental models;technology validation;computer science;attribute evaluation;product development;software engineering experimentation;Testing;Computer science;Software safety;Costs;Paper technology;Taxonomy;Particle measurements;Software measurement;Time measurement;Hardware},
doi={10.1109/2.675630},
ISSN={0018-9162},
month={May},}

@INPROCEEDINGS{6032494,
author={R. {Wettel} and M. {Lanza} and R. {Robbes}},
booktitle={2011 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)},
title={Software systems as cities: a controlled experiment},
year={2011},
volume={},
number={},
pages={551-560},
keywords={data visualisation;reverse engineering;software maintenance;software systems;program comprehension technique;software maintenance;reverse engineering;software evolution analysis;3D software visualization approach;city metaphor;CodeCity;task correctness;task completion time;Software;Visualization;Industries;Measurement;Data visualization;Maintenance engineering;Cities and towns;empirical validation;software visualization},
doi={10.1145/1985793.1985868},
ISSN={1558-1225},
month={May},}

@misc{monperrus2015introduction,
  title={Introduction to Empirical Software Engineering},
  author={Monperrus, Martin},
  year={2015},
  publisher={Citeseer},
  howpublished={\url{http://www.monperrus.net/martin/introduction-to-empirical-software-engineering.pdf}}
}

@Article{Runeson2008,
author="Runeson, Per
and H{\"o}st, Martin",
title="Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering",
journal="Empirical Software Engineering",
year="2008",
month="Dec",
day="19",
volume="14",
number="2",
pages="131",
abstract="Case study is a suitable research methodology for software engineering research since it studies contemporary phenomena in its natural context. However, the understanding of what constitutes a case study varies, and hence the quality of the resulting studies. This paper aims at providing an introduction to case study methodology and guidelines for researchers conducting case studies and readers studying reports of such studies. The content is based on the authors' own experience from conducting and reading case studies. The terminology and guidelines are compiled from different methodology handbooks in other research domains, in particular social science and information systems, and adapted to the needs in software engineering. We present recommended practices for software engineering case studies as well as empirically derived and evaluated checklists for researchers and readers of case study research.",
issn="1573-7616",
doi="10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8",
url="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8"
}

@article{Avison:1999:AR:291469.291479,
 author = {Avison, David E. and Lau, Francis and Myers, Michael D. and Nielsen, Peter Axel},
 title = {Action Research},
 journal = {Commun. ACM},
 issue_date = {Jan. 1999},
 volume = {42},
 number = {1},
 month = jan,
 year = {1999},
 issn = {0001-0782},
 pages = {94--97},
 numpages = {4},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/291469.291479},
 doi = {10.1145/291469.291479},
 acmid = {291479},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
} 

@book{yin2009case,
  title={Case Study Research: Design and Methods},
  author={Yin, R.K.},
  isbn={9781412960991},
  lccn={2008019313},
  series={Applied Social Research Methods},
  year={2009},
  publisher={SAGE Publications}
}

@article{Benbasat:1987:CRS:35194.35201,
 author = {Benbasat, Izak and Goldstein, David K. and Mead, Melissa},
 title = {The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems},
 journal = {MIS Q.},
 issue_date = {Sept. 1987},
 volume = {11},
 number = {3},
 month = sep,
 year = {1987},
 issn = {0276-7783},
 pages = {369--386},
 numpages = {18},
 url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/248684},
 doi = {10.2307/248684},
 acmid = {35201},
 publisher = {Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center},
 address = {Minneapolis, MN, USA},
} 

@inproceedings{Brereton:2008:UPT:2227115.2227120,
 author = {Brereton, Pearl and Kitchenham, Barbara and Budgen, David and Li, Zhi},
 title = {Using a Protocol Template for Case Study Planning},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering},
 series = {EASE'08},
 year = {2008},
 location = {Italy},
 pages = {41--48},
 numpages = {8},
 url = {http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2227115.2227120},
 acmid = {2227120},
 publisher = {BCS Learning \& Development Ltd.},
 address = {Swindon, UK},
 keywords = {case study, protocol, template},
} 

@Article{Lethbridge2005,
author="Lethbridge, Timothy C.
and Sim, Susan Elliott
and Singer, Janice",
title="Studying Software Engineers: Data Collection Techniques for Software Field Studies",
journal="Empirical Software Engineering",
year="2005",
month="Jul",
day="01",
volume="10",
number="3",
pages="311--341",
abstract="Software engineering is an intensively people-oriented activity, yet too little is known about how designers, maintainers, requirements analysts and all other types of software engineers perform their work. In order to improve software engineering tools and practice, it is therefore essential to conduct field studies, i.e. to study real practitioners as they solve real problems. To do so effectively, however, requires an understanding of the techniques most suited to each type of field study task. In this paper, we provide a taxonomy of techniques, focusing on those for data collection. The taxonomy is organized according to the degree of human intervention each requires. For each technique, we provide examples from the literature, an analysis of some of its advantages and disadvantages, and a discussion of how to use it effectively. We also briefly talk about field study design in general, and data analysis.",
issn="1573-7616",
doi="10.1007/s10664-005-1290-x",
url="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-005-1290-x"
}

@book{Runeson:2012:CSR:2361717,
 author = {Runeson, Per and Host, Martin and Rainer, Austen and Regnell, Bjorn},
 title = {Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples},
 year = {2012},
 isbn = {1118104358, 9781118104354},
 edition = {1st},
 publisher = {Wiley Publishing},
} 

@article{Robinson:2007:EES:1240332.1240476,
 author = {Robinson, Hugh and Segal, Judith and Sharp, Helen},
 title = {Ethnographically-informed Empirical Studies of Software Practice},
 journal = {Inf. Softw. Technol.},
 issue_date = {June, 2007},
 volume = {49},
 number = {6},
 month = jun,
 year = {2007},
 issn = {0950-5849},
 pages = {540--551},
 numpages = {12},
 url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.007},
 doi = {10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.007},
 acmid = {1240476},
 publisher = {Butterworth-Heinemann},
 address = {Newton, MA, USA},
 keywords = {Field studies, Qualitative analysis, Software practice},
}

@article{gqm,
author = {R. Basili, Victor and Caldiera, Gianluigi and Rombach, Dieter},
year = {1994},
month = {01},
pages = {},
title = {The goal question metric approach},
volume = {1},
journal = {Encyclopedia of Software Engineering}
}

@ARTICLE{Seaman,
author={C. B. {Seaman}},
journal={IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering},
title={Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering},
year={1999},
volume={25},
number={4},
pages={557-572},
keywords={user interfaces;human factors;software development management;project management;qualitative methods;empirical studies;software engineering;research community;human aspects;software development;research questions;research methods;nontechnical aspects;qualitative research methods;human behaviour;data collection;quantitative methods;real software engineering studies;Software engineering;Humans;Programming;Data analysis;Design for experiments;Laboratories;Computer industry;Software development management;Design methodology},
doi={10.1109/32.799955},
ISSN={0098-5589},
month={July},}

@article{Jedlitschka2005ReportingGF,
  title={Reporting guidelines for controlled experiments in software engineering},
  author={Andreas Jedlitschka and Dietmar Pfahl},
  journal={2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005.},
  year={2005},
  pages={10 pp.-}
}

@inproceedings{Perry:2006:CSS:1134285.1134497,
 author = {Perry, Dewayne E. and Sim, Susan Elliott and Easterbrook, Steve},
 title = {Case Studies for Software Engineers (Tutorial Slides)},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering},
 series = {ICSE '06},
 year = {2006},
 location = {Shanghai, China},
 url = {http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~sme/case-studies/case_study_tutorial_slides.pdf},
 doi = {10.1145/1134285.1134497},
 acmid = {1134497},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {case studies, empirical studies, software engineering},
} 

@mastersthesis{context-mapper-dsl,
  author       = {Stefan Kapferer}, 
  title        = {A Domain-specific Language for Service Decomposition},
  school       = {University of Applied Sciences of Eastern Switzerland (HSR FHO)},
  year         = 2018,
  type         ={{Term Project}},
  note         = {Publication: \url{https://eprints.hsr.ch/722/}}
}

@book{EvansEric2012Dd:t,
publisher = {Addison-Wesley},
isbn = {978-0-321-12521-7},
year = {2012},
title = {Domain-driven design : tackling complexity in the heart of software},
edition = {18th prin.},
language = {eng},
address = {Upper Saddle River, NJ},
author = {Evans, Eric},
keywords = {SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: 004*04*04},
}

@article{Poltronieri:2018:UEF:3284971.3284973,
 author = {Poltronieri, Ildevana and Zorzo, Avelino Francisco and Bernardino, Maicon and de Borba Campos, Marcia},
 title = {Usability Evaluation Framework for Domain-specific Language: A Focus Group Study},
 journal = {SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev.},
 issue_date = {September 2018},
 volume = {18},
 number = {3},
 month = oct,
 year = {2018},
 issn = {1559-6915},
 pages = {5--18},
 numpages = {14},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3284971.3284973},
 doi = {10.1145/3284971.3284973},
 acmid = {3284973},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {domain-specific languages, focus group, usability evaluation, usability testing},
}

@InProceedings{10.1007/978-3-319-58071-5_39,
author="Poltronieri Rodrigues, Ildevana
and de Borba Campos, M{\'a}rcia
and Zorzo, Avelino F.",
editor="Kurosu, Masaaki",
title="Usability Evaluation of Domain-Specific Languages: A Systematic Literature Review",
booktitle="Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality",
year="2017",
publisher="Springer International Publishing",
address="Cham",
pages="522--534",
abstract="Software developers have always been concerned with the quality of the products they produce. Although software engineers use new methods to evaluate the quality of their software, there are still some concerns in several of the methods they use when developing software, for example, when using Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs). One of the main goals of DSLs is to ease the work of developers in different areas. However, to achieve this goal it is necessary to provide an evaluation of the usability of such languages. Although it is possible to find some experiments to evaluate such languages, usually this experiments are subjective and do not use techniques from the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) area. Therefore, this paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) in which a discussion on the usability of DSLs is presented. This paper also presents a mapping to show how usability has been assessed by researchers in their work.",
isbn="978-3-319-58071-5"
}

@book{biemer2003introduction,
  title={Introduction to Survey Quality},
  author={Biemer, P.P. and Lyberg, L.E.},
  isbn={9780471458722},
  series={Wiley Series in Survey Methodology},
  year={2003},
  publisher={Wiley}
}

@inproceedings{Usman:2015:EEA:2745802.2745813,
 author = {Usman, Muhammad and Mendes, Emilia and B\"{o}rstler, J\"{u}rgen},
 title = {Effort Estimation in Agile Software Development: A Survey on the State of the Practice},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering},
 series = {EASE '15},
 year = {2015},
 isbn = {978-1-4503-3350-4},
 location = {Nanjing, China},
 pages = {12:1--12:10},
 articleno = {12},
 numpages = {10},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2745802.2745813},
 doi = {10.1145/2745802.2745813},
 acmid = {2745813},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {agile software development, effort estimation, empirical study},
} 

@inproceedings{Muslu:2014:TCD:2568225.2568284,
 author = {Mu\c{s}lu, K\ivan\c{c} and Bird, Christian and Nagappan, Nachiappan and Czerwonka, Jacek},
 title = {Transition from Centralized to Decentralized Version Control Systems: A Case Study on Reasons, Barriers, and Outcomes},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering},
 series = {ICSE 2014},
 year = {2014},
 isbn = {978-1-4503-2756-5},
 location = {Hyderabad, India},
 pages = {334--344},
 numpages = {11},
 url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2568225.2568284},
 doi = {10.1145/2568225.2568284},
 acmid = {2568284},
 publisher = {ACM},
 address = {New York, NY, USA},
 keywords = {CVCS, DVCS, Version control system, barriers, centralized, distributed, empirical, productivity, transition},
} 

@Inbook{Svejvig2010,
author="Svejvig, Per
and Fladkj{\ae}r Nielsen, Ann-Dorte",
editor="{\v{S}}mite, Darja
and Moe, Nils Brede
and {\AA}gerfalk, P{\"a}r J.",
title="The Dilemma of High Level Planning in Distributed Agile Software Projects: An Action Research Study in a Danish Bank",
bookTitle="Agility Across Time and Space: Implementing Agile Methods in Global Software Projects",
year="2010",
publisher="Springer Berlin Heidelberg",
address="Berlin, Heidelberg",
pages="171--182",
abstract="The chapter reports on an action research study with the aim to design a high level planning process in distributed and co-located software projects based on agile methods. The main contributions are the insight that high level planning process is highly integrated with other project disciplines and specific steps has to be taken to apply the process in distributed projects; and the action research approach is indeed suitable to software process improvements.",
isbn="978-3-642-12442-6",
doi="10.1007/978-3-642-12442-6\_12"
}

@Inbook{Tversky1975,
author="Tversky, Amos
and Kahneman, Daniel",
editor="Wendt, Dirk
and Vlek, Charles",
title="Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases",
bookTitle="Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making: Selected Proceedings of an Interdisciplinary Research Conference, Rome, 3--6 September, 1973",
year="1975",
publisher="Springer Netherlands",
address="Dordrecht",
pages="141--162",
abstract="This paper describes three heuristics, or mental operations, that are employed in judgment under uncertainty. (i) An assessment of representativeness or similarity, which is usually performed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to a class or process B. (ii) An assessment of the availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development. (iii) An adjustment from a starting point, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgments and decisions in situations of uncertainty.",
isbn="978-94-010-1834-0",
doi="10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0\_8",
url="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8"
}

@misc{agile101,
  title={Agile 101},
  author={{Agile Alliance}},
  publisher={Agile Alliance},
  howpublished={\url{https://www.agilealliance.org/agile101/} [Accessed: Friday, May 3, 2019]}
}