[r2dbc] Support for one-to-one and one-to-many relationships #1834
Labels
in: r2dbc
Spring Data R2DBC
status: pending-design-work
Needs design work before any code can be developed
status: waiting-for-triage
An issue we've not yet triaged
Since spring-data-r2dbc is now part of spring-data-relational, I wanted to reopen a much-discussed topic.
Quote from the original issue:
"Spring Data JDBC supports one-to-one and one-to-many (either as set, list or map) relationships:
https://docs.spring.io/spring-data/relational/reference/jdbc/mapping.html#jdbc.entity-persistence.types
It would be really useful to have this feature with R2DBC as well."
Being able to map "simple" relations would make working with r2dbc much easier. Many of our developers do not switch to Spring's reactive stack due to the lack of the ability to represent relations and prefer to stick with the MVC variant, where they can make use of JPA and Hibernate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: