-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 278
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New license request: CC-PDM-1.0 [SPDX-Online-Tools] #2452
Comments
(Note to self: If/when this license request is approved, I can change TechSmart internal identifiers for this license from "LicenseRef-CC-PDM-1.0" to just "CC-PDM-1.0", or whatever the final identifier is.) |
{metæffekt} Universe ScanCode Comment |
Agreed. I see that the other Creative Commons licenses generally include the version number, even for 1.0 license versions. Followups:
|
Given we have all the other CC licenses and public domain dedications, I'm inclined to add, but I'm a bit confused on a couple things:
thanks! |
ok, I think @karsten-klein already answered my first question, actually. and he already gave a thumbs up to including. I'd still be nice to see any example of actual use though! I'm going to mark as accepted and leave the waiting for submitter label as well, as a reminder of both |
Yes, I transcribed the text within the box on that page to Markdown format. I left off bold formatting. However it looks like I also left off the footnotes, which could be important, although are outside the box on that page. If the footnotes were included you'd also see the following at the bottom of the transcribed document and some extra references in the main text like
Internal license data at TechSmart currently uses the transcribed text. After our Asset Licensing feature is completed, student-exported projects using the text will start appearing on GitHub. I haven't identified any preexisting public places where any variation of the deed is used; I've only seen the mark's name used ("CC PDM 1.0"). |
@davidfstr - by "internal license data" - does that mean that TechSmart is not using the dedication on an actual work (yet)?' A couple examples in Github I found: |
The asset-to-license metadata association is tracked but the deed isn't yet automatically added to any coding projects that are exported. |
1. License Name: Public Domain Mark 1.0 Universal
2. Short identifier:
CC-PDMCC-PDM-1.03. License Author or steward: Creative Commons
4. Comments:
This deed is maintained by Creative Commons, a well-known license steward with most (all?) of its other licenses on the SPDX License List.
This deed (Public Domain Mark 1.0 Universal) is one of the two replacements for the older deprecated Public Domain Dedication and Certification (PDDC) which is already on the SPDX license list. (The other replacement is CC0, which is also already registered on the SPDX list.)
This deed intends to be used by TechSmart (a company I represent) to mark most of the works it is using from Project Gutenberg, which has many works whose copyright has expired in at least the United States and likely worldwide as well. Therefore I have linked below to both 1. a Project Gutenberg work and 2. TechSmart's Curriculum page to indicate its planned usage of this deed.
The deed is reusable, intended to be used by anyone.
The deed is stable, since its introduction circa 2010.
5. License Request Url: http://tools.spdx.org/app/license_requests/363
6. URL(s): https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
7. OSI Status: Unknown
8. Example Projects: https://gutenberg.org/ebooks/41445, https://www.techsmart.codes/curriculum/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: