-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Process Webhook without dispatching job #9
Comments
Currently this is not possible without introducing breaking changes. I'll revisit this issue when creating a new major version. |
Is there any news on this issue? |
This would make things more simple. |
@freekmurze shouldn't this issue be re-opened if it's still on the roadmap? |
The label will make me look at this issue again whenever I should create a new major version. |
4 years later I find myself needing this feature again for another project, any progress? We have 10 incoming webhooks and need 3 of them to return on sync rather than running as a job - only way is to remove them from this package at the moment. |
I need to process a webhook that returns the response, but ProcessWebhookJob implements ShouldQueue.
Is it possible to override this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: