Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Package for winget (and maybe chocolatey?) #130

Open
a-p-jo opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Package for winget (and maybe chocolatey?) #130

a-p-jo opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@a-p-jo
Copy link

a-p-jo commented May 16, 2024

w64devkit is excellent software, but unfortunately it isn't yet packaged for any package manager. It could be worth the while to package it for winget, and perhaps also for chocolatey (since the former is only available for Windows 10 or higher. This way, w64devkit updates can be streamlined along with all others, instead of being a special case. Thanks!

@Peter0x44
Copy link
Contributor

Peter0x44 commented May 18, 2024

Dup of #23, pretty much. w64devkit isn't something that really needs updating often, nor are its updates ever anything critical or must have, and you can already obtain a compiler using mingw-w64 with winget.

I'm not sure what the advantage would be. If you really prefer, you can write a script to update w64devkit instead of doing it manually.

@skeeto
Copy link
Owner

skeeto commented May 19, 2024 via email

@a-p-jo
Copy link
Author

a-p-jo commented May 29, 2024

@Peter0x44 :

If you really prefer, you can write a script to update w64devkit instead of doing it manually

I plan to make a winget package myself, if @skeeto doesn't mind.

@skeeto
Copy link
Owner

skeeto commented May 29, 2024 via email

@8bitZeta
Copy link

Just popping in to say that your (@skeeto) implementation of BusyBox-32 is much nicer than the one directly from Winget as it already has proper aliases made.

Would absolutely love a Winget package.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants