Current state?

[lemunozm]

Hi!

Your UdpLike abstraction is just what I looking for in a library of this style 😄

I am considering adding your library as an adapter in message-io, I am curious about the current state and the stability. There is some roadmap in mind or is it in disuse?

Thanks!

[sirkibsirkib]

Hey sorry for the late reply. I have been neglecting this repo for some time but intend to pick it up again. I don't have a roadmap in mind, as I've got other obligations these days, but I'd be happy to hear about your use case, and perhaps take it into consideration?

[lemunozm]

Hi @sirkibsirkib, thanks for your answer!

I have no choice to test your library yet. I only wanted to be sure that if I make an adapter for message-io using your protocol and I find any issue or potential improvement I can contribute with it or receive minimal support. I understand that this could be the case.

Do you considerer that the library is more or less ready for production in basic usage?

[sirkibsirkib]

I would consider this library still very experimental, and furthermore, I intend to make some breaking changes in the future. I took a look at your message-io library and it looks interesting. If I ever finish these changes, perhaps I will open an issue with your library for it to include an adapter?

If you are mostly only interested in the UdpLike abstraction, I would suggest writing it yourself (or feel free to copy mine, I don't mind at all), because I consider this a very small part of my library, which is mostly concerned about the added reliability mechanisms.

[lemunozm]

Of course, you can open the issue :)

In fact, what I am interested in your library is the reliable mechanism on top of UDP. Is the UdpLike what I would use to "link" it with message-io that is based on mio. I found other libraries similar to yours but uses underlying a socket that I can not handle and use with mio.