Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Local vs Remote Repos #70

Open
opie4624 opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Local vs Remote Repos #70

opie4624 opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@opie4624
Copy link
Contributor

opie4624 commented Feb 21, 2023

I've been using Runrestic for the incredibly long time of almost 72hrs now. (Quite liking it!) I do quite a lot of work without a connection, so restic + runrestic has been me slowly building up a time-machine like backup strategy. Time Machine backs up locally to a hidden partition, then copies over backups to the network storage when you're back within the network. With this background in mind, does it make sense to try to expand runrestic to have the concept of "backup" repos vs "copy-to" repos? prune and check would still need to be done against these copy-to repos, but backing up would always happen to a local destination first, with a second phase of copying out to these other repos if reachable, next.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant