Alias .of for .ofType

[Riim]

ow.array.of(ow.string)
clearly better than
ow.array.ofType(ow.string)

[sindresorhus]

I'm not interested in adding aliases. That just leads to inconsistent code.

I don't remember exactly why we went with .ofType. It might have been because ofType accepts any predicate, so ow.array.ofType(() => …) is clearer than ow.array.of(() => …).

I'll leave this open for other people to comment their opinion.