Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ad-blocking support #82

Closed
xplosionmind opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Ad-blocking support #82

xplosionmind opened this issue Jun 2, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@xplosionmind
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

My current Plash page is the main page of a news website. It is clammed with ads. Since the purpose of having a webpage as the desktop wallpaper is having the most important things ready at a glance, this becomes useless since 2/3 of the page are made of ads, and only 1/3 of news.


Describe the solution you'd like

Either:

  • the ability of choosing an installed browser (e.g. Firefox) as the rendering engine, together with all of the extensions it includes. In this way, I would have the page beautifully displayed.
  • adding an ad-blocking service, embedded in Plash. Since uBlock Origin is open source, I do not think it is a hard task.

Describe alternatives you've considered

  • Keeping the homepage as-is
  • changing news website, even if most of them have the same issue
@xplosionmind xplosionmind added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 2, 2021
@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

the ability of choosing an installed browser (e.g. Firefox) as the rendering engine, together with all of the extensions it includes. In this way, I would have the page beautifully displayed.

This is not possible. Plash deeply depends on the bundled WebKit version in macOS.

adding an ad-blocking service, embedded in Plash. Since uBlock Origin is open source, I do not think it is a hard task.

A web view is not the same as a full browser. Plash uses a web view. It's not possible to directly integrate a Safari extension.

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Owner

Duplicate of #37

@sindresorhus sindresorhus marked this as a duplicate of #37 Jun 2, 2021
@xplosionmind
Copy link
Author

I am sorry, my bad. I missed the duplicate issue. Thanks a lot anyways!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants