Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluation in classifier training is using supervised segmentation maps? #19

Open
lucasdavid opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@lucasdavid
Copy link

Hello, thank you for the great repository! It's pretty impressive how organized it is.

I have a critic (or maybe a question, in case I got it wrong) regarding the training of the classifier, though:
I understand the importance of measuring and logging the mIoU during training (specially when creating the ablation section in your paper), however it doesn't strike me as correct to save the model with best mIoU. This procedural decision is based on fully supervised segmentation information, which should not be available for a truly weakly supervised problem; while resulting in a model better suited for segmentation.
The paper doesn't address this. Am I right to assume all models were trained like this? Were there any trainings where other metrics were considered when saving the model (e.g. classification loss or Eq (7) in the paper)?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant