You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
IMO can we use more up-to-date "source" such as: highlightjs/highlight.js#2832 instead of the "sublime text" highlight?
The Julia sublime-syntax definition was last updated 23 days ago, seems quite recent to me. JuliaEditorSupport/Julia-sublime@48639e1
But no, bat relies on sublime-syntax files, there is no support for js highlighting libraries, nor are we likely to add any.
It's possible that we need to reference a newer Julia submodule version, but it may use more recent features which the syntax highlighting library we are using doesn't handle yet.
As you can see the
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5306213/122456073-67a39e00-cfad-11eb-8ba7-717522e179fd.png)
64
inFloat64
is inappropriately highlighted as a number.For comparison this is what the code looks like in neovim with JuliaVim:
IMO can we use more up-to-date "source" such as: highlightjs/highlight.js#2832 instead of the "sublime text" highlight?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: