Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade versions of requirements in requirements.txt #623

Closed
rahulkumaran opened this issue Oct 3, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Upgrade versions of requirements in requirements.txt #623

rahulkumaran opened this issue Oct 3, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
difficulty: easy fix is easy in difficulty type: community enhancement feature request not on Twilio's roadmap

Comments

@rahulkumaran
Copy link
Contributor

rahulkumaran commented Oct 3, 2018

Issue Summary

Update the version numbers of the requirements in requirements.txt as currently we have versions above the current mentioned ones that are stable.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Check requirements.txt

It's better to stay up to date with these as it would help us avoid problems later.
I'd like to work on this.

@thinkingserious thinkingserious added type: community enhancement feature request not on Twilio's roadmap status: work in progress Twilio or the community is in the process of implementing hacktoberfest difficulty: easy fix is easy in difficulty labels Oct 4, 2018
@jamietanna
Copy link

@thinkingserious I think this can probably be closed now?

@premkagrani
Copy link

Is it still open?If yes i would like to take it up!

@childish-sambino
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by #630

@childish-sambino childish-sambino removed the status: work in progress Twilio or the community is in the process of implementing label Jul 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
difficulty: easy fix is easy in difficulty type: community enhancement feature request not on Twilio's roadmap
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants