Skip to content

trading: rc6 gate rulings: G3 qualified by the retained first replay; G4 excluded (dated) - #824

Merged
seathatflowsinourveins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
trading/rc6-gate-rulings-20261007
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

seathatflowsinourveins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
trading/rc6-gate-rulings-20261007

Conversation

@seathatflowsinourveins

@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Scope

  • What this PR changes: one dated record, blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/rc6-gate-rulings-20261007.json, with the gate owner's rulings on the NautilusTrader rc6 candidate's G3 and G4 (the grand-catalog lane's question Q26).
  • Why: the command center ruled on both. G3 is qualified by the retained first replay. G4 becomes a dated exclusion rather than an open-ended gate.
  • Base commit: origin/main at branch time.
  • Lane: lane:trading.
  • Owned paths touched: that one file. It needs no registry entry, so manifests/evidence.json and manifests/stack.json are untouched.

The rulings:

  • G3: (a). The retained first replay first-rc6-spy-20261006T055742Z (NativeStack2604, one_zero, run and compare exit 0 and 0, 136 PASS with a 106-check execution subset that is never added to it) is G3's qualifying result, with its original date and pre-C5 scope. It covers exactly the seven reviewed rc6 files at the hashes in deviation-acceptance-rc6.json. If any of them changes, a new qualification record comes before any new qualifying run.
  • G4: EXCLUDED, dated 2026-10-07. The AAPL baseline and fee_slippage_stress cases need the retained Alpaca run that equity-replay/receipt.json identifies only by hash (a59c6ed7… for the receipt, adb2a240… for the selected rows). A search on NativeStack found neither hash: 7,785 Alpaca-path JSON files and 46,980 receipt or AAPL-named files hashed, no match. NativeStack2604 holds no trading data by design.
    • Overturn route: a dated deviation for a hash-gated reacquisition of the 15 sessions 2020-08-10..2020-08-28, qualifying only if the selected rows hash to adb2a240…. It belongs to the trading lane's next data wave.
    • Standing note: the Mac host's lane searches for the two hashes when that host is next online.
    • No rc6 launcher vector is written without the inputs. rc6's other checks proceed.

SOTA sources

  • The rc6 candidate, PR Qualify the isolated NautilusTrader rc6 runtime candidate #761 at 577101588db61764773bdb1651d60e88eeb24025:
    • blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/spy-parity/deviation-acceptance-rc6.json (the first-only seal and the seven reviewed hashes);
    • evidence/receipts/nautilus-rc6-spy-first-replication-20261006.json (the first replay's run block and result);
    • blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/equity-replay/receipt.json (the AAPL input hashes and command template);
    • docs/decisions/2026-10-06-nautilus-rc6-runtime-candidate.md (AAPL blocked).
  • The command center's items task-native-agent-stack-5f-20261006T194228Z and task-native-agent-stack-5f-20261007T003642Z.

Evidence-class table

Claim Evidence class Command / receipt
G3's result and scope repository record at a pinned commit the first-replication receipt and the acceptance seal at 577101588
G4's inputs are on no searched path of NativeStack local host search (absence within the stated scope only) SHA-256 of the files named in the record's search block, no match for either hash

Local commands run

$ python3 -c "import json; json.load(open('blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/rc6-gate-rulings-20261007.json'))"
$ python3 scripts/validate.py
{"components": 69, "hashed_files": 10388, "profiles": 4, "receipts": 223, "status": "passed"}

Decision record

The command center's items cited above; this record transcribes their rulings.

Host evidence

Not applicable: this PR adds or changes no file under evidence/hosts/.

  • python3 scripts/host_receipts.py validate passes for every new/changed receipt (none; scripts/validate.py exits 0 at 5bdbd64).
  • Independent review is recorded or requested: the cross-family connector review threads (P1, P2) are answered and resolved, and the co-op re-reads at this head.
  • No platform_status change is made from a host receipt alone (none changes).

Checklist

  • New/changed GitHub Actions are pinned to a full commit SHA with a version comment (no workflow changes here).
  • New/changed workflows declare top-level permissions: {} and grant each job only what it needs (no workflow changes here).
  • No secrets are printed, logged or committed; no new required secret was added.
  • No new paid hosting, subscription or billing surface was introduced.
  • Peer-owned untracked files and worktrees were preserved.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@seathatflowsinourveins seathatflowsinourveins added the lane:trading Trading lane: sim, paper and live north star label Oct 7, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-07T00:44:18.297742Z a365052 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a36505214c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/rc6-gate-rulings-20261007.json Outdated
@seathatflowsinourveins

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Mac host search for the two G4 AAPL input hashes (Mac coordinator, 2026-10-08 00:41Z): no match.

This is the search rulings.G4.standing_note asks for. Read-only whole-file SHA256 over every regular data-like file. Symlinks were not followed, files were capped at 2 GiB (none exceeded it), and there were 0 read errors. Extensions: csv, tsv, parquet, json, jsonl, gz, zip, zst, feather, arrow, txt, bin, dbn, pkl, npz, h5/hdf5, db and sqlite. node_modules, .git, virtual environments and caches were skipped.

Pass Roots Files hashed Matches
1 (00:39:04-00:39:41Z) ~/Documents/Trading, ~/code, ~/Downloads, ~/Documents/Codex 218,615 0
2 (00:40:00-00:40:33Z) all of ~/Documents, ~/Desktop, iCloud Drive (~/Library/Mobile Documents), ~/.local/share, ~/.local/state 138,971 0
  • Targets: a59c6ed74e839ca43ee704033e207865ed938a22e4738afce22ec197e91b6bcd (the original Alpaca receipt) and adb2a240727bcd0c309c0c0ae34c649387ba23a0eba3da5d99c067d25bb06ad0 (the selected rows).
  • No file named for AAPL with a 2020 path or a 202008 name was found either.
  • /Volumes holds only the boot volume and mounted application images, so no external data drive was in scope.

Limit: the selected-rows hash is computed over derived rows, so a whole-file search can match it only if some file stores exactly those rows. A raw multi-session file holding the same sessions would not match it. With no AAPL 2020 file on the Mac at all, the overturn route (a hash-gated reacquisition in the trading lane's next data wave) stands.

Evidence on the Mac: ~/.local/state/native-agent-stack/evidence/aapl-g4-hash-search-20261008/ (search.py, both reports, SHA256SUMS).

Scout and others added 3 commits October 7, 2026 21:33
… G4 excluded (dated)

The command center's rulings (items task-native-agent-stack-5f-20261006T194228Z and
task-native-agent-stack-5f-20261007T003642Z) on the grand-catalog lane's question Q26 for the
NautilusTrader rc6 candidate (#761 at 5771015): G3 is (a), the retained first replay
first-rc6-spy-20261006T055742Z (136 PASS, pre-C5 scope, the seven reviewed files); G4 (the AAPL
baseline and fee_slippage_stress cases) is EXCLUDED as of 2026-10-07 because its qualifying inputs are
on no live host, with a hash-gated reacquisition as the overturn route and a Mac-host search as a
standing note.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… hash search: no match, dated)

The CC's item task-native-agent-stack-5f-20261008T004814Z: one dated line on G4 recording the Mac coordinator's
read-only hash search of 2026-10-08 (no match for either hash, no AAPL 2020 file); G4 stays EXCLUDED and the overturn
route stands. Nothing else in the rulings file changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… retained with hashes; G4 reason scoped to the searched hosts)

P1 (line 14): the source pin 5771015 is the head of open PR #761 (refs/pull/761/head), outside main's
history. G3 now retains the evidence's location and sha256 values (the receipt, the decision record, the
deviation acceptance and the seven reviewed files) so anyone can verify them there, or in main once #761
lands, before relying on G3's status. The ruling itself is unchanged.
P2 (line 43): G4's reason names the hosts actually searched, NativeStack (2026-10-07) and the Mac
(2026-10-08), and that NativeStack2604 holds no trading data by design, instead of 'any live host'.
The command center's item task-native-agent-stack-5f-20261008T013145Z.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins force-pushed the trading/rc6-gate-rulings-20261007 branch from 507640e to 5bdbd64 Compare October 8, 2026 01:34
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: landing at head 5bdbd641aa3aae2507a5e771616e07dadeb62f96. The command center (wsl-architecture-design) gave its ACK at this exact head; under the user's 2026-10-04 decision it owns merges that touch the hot registry. The read-only cross-family review (GPT-6.1 Sol max, the packaged Codex SDK worker) returned ACCEPT at this exact head, with no P1 item.

Observed main 2cad4d7407e0497d4eaa51dc3c4410ef112cd928. coordination/merge_tree_landing_check.py (sha256 a11649fcf2e5844c…) exit 0:

main 2cad4d7407e0497d4eaa51dc3c4410ef112cd928 head 5bdbd641aa3aae2507a5e771616e07dadeb62f96 base ffd4b8508ae2494bf5bf7ed9df1932537dbb7ecf merged-tree d8a826cb2386ed8c845fb6b914f4be503cc2d11c merge-tree-exit 0
ok   1: clean three-way merge
ok   2: merged-vs-main paths 1, outside PR-owned 0 []
ok   3: main drift 11 paths, overlap with PR-owned inputs (registry excluded) []
ok   4: registry foreign rows equal True, order preserved True, PR-owned rows 0, unowned top-level keys differing []
ok   5: merged files[] sorted by path with no duplicates: True (10566 rows)
LANDABLE
condition 5: merged files[] sorted and unique (tree d8a826cb2386ed8c845fb6b914f4be503cc2d11c)

Required checks at this head: 7 pass . Unresolved review threads: 0.

@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins merged commit 90f9d32 into main Oct 8, 2026
28 of 31 checks passed
@seathatflowsinourveins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Claude session native-agent-stack-5f: post-merge observation. Landed as 90f9d32dbb9092b02ed6ca7f9d08e1e4807ad6ab (parent 2cad4d7407e0497d4eaa51dc3c4410ef112cd928), tree d8a826cb2386ed8c845fb6b914f4be503cc2d11c. The landed tree equals the checked merged tree and the parent is the observed main.

@seathatflowsinourveins
seathatflowsinourveins deleted the trading/rc6-gate-rulings-20261007 branch October 8, 2026 03:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lane:trading Trading lane: sim, paper and live north star

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant