IBKR local acceptance (steps 2-4) prep: awaiting the user's paper IB Gateway sign-in by seathatflowsinourveins · Pull Request #280 · native-agent-stack/native-agent-stack

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-09-25T19:48:29Z

Draft: waiting for the user's paper IB Gateway sign-in. This is preparation only. No Gateway was started, no IB connection was made and no order was placed. The ibkr-local-acceptance gate stays not_established and no ibkr-acceptance/receipt.json exists. The IBKR paper account needs a human second-factor sign-in, which automation cannot do.

What

This PR prepares acceptance-plan section 5, steps 2 to 4, for the ibkr-local-acceptance gate (catalogs/us-equities/gates-20260922.json). It currently blocks the live rung together with leverage-ladder-1x/2x/4x and live-go.

Version-selection decision record (docs/decisions/2026-09-25-ibkr-local-acceptance-version-selection.md, keep-but-compare). It implements the user's decision of 2026-09-25, quoted verbatim in the record as relayed by the live-gates coordinator: "NautilusTrader 1.231.0 + ibapi 10.45.1 for local acceptance, keep-but-compare against the first 2.0.x release containing nautilus_trader PR #5041". Local acceptance runs on NautilusTrader 1.231.0's Python IB adapter (official ibapi 10.45.1). The engine destination in runtime-target.json is unchanged, no gate flips, and live-go is untouched.
- The comparator is the first 2.0.x release (not a dev wheel) containing nautilus_trader#5041; no release contains it yet. It runs the same frozen case set, and 1.231.0 is overturned at once if it fails a case that release passes.
- The pinned 2.0.0rc5 Rust adapter is not an overturn arm. An rc5 stock-order probe stays only as optional evidence for the #4983 reclassification. Any other trigger needs a new user decision.
Runner blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-acceptance/local_acceptance.py. It runs three fresh-process TradingNode phases on client id 93, with an official-ibapi observer on client 98. Cases:
- A1: resting R1 accepted.
- A2: client-id ownership. A contender on 93 gets IB 326, and orderRef, orderId and permId map to the node's order.
- A3: reconnect with R1 working, ending in an IB-confirmed cancel.
- A4: R2 left working.
- B1: restart reconciliation adopts R2 through external_order_claims.
- B2: kill switch. A durable 0600 latch is written, the risk engine goes HALTED, an alert is raised, P1 is denied locally and R2 is cancelled at IB.
- C1: after another restart the latch keeps HALTED, and P2 is denied.
The runner refuses by default:
- run connects nothing without --enable-paper-orders.
- Live ports 4001 and 7496 are refused as refused_live_port, and any other port except 4002 and 7497 is refused before connecting.
- Also refused: a non-DU or multi-account Gateway, existing positions or orders, a busy client id 93, an engaged latch, a concurrent run (flock), missing prerequisite receipts, any runtime other than 1.231.0/10.45.1, a start outside the session window, and a steps receipt outside the repository.
- Orders are resting BUY limits at half the bid only: at most 4 per run, 2 of them reaching IB, with no marketable or flattening path.
Kill-switch latch and run lock live in one frozen per-account directory (CONTROL_DIR: the password-database home, not $HOME, XDG_STATE_HOME or --state-dir, plus .local/state/native-agent-stack/ibkr-local-acceptance; files 0600, directory 0700). run holds the lock for the whole run and preflight holds it while it connects, so with any --state-dir a preflight during a run is refused, a run during a preflight is refused, and both see an engaged latch.
Plans (revision 3, still before any run): local-acceptance-plan.json (regular session) and local-acceptance-plan-post.json (16:00 to 20:00 with outsideRth, regenerated from the regular plan). Both have an overall deadline of 1,620 s against a computed worst case of 1,575 s.
Gate receipt ibkr-acceptance/receipt.json. Its preregistered schema is {schema_version 1, kind native_ibkr_local_acceptance, status passed, broker ibkr}. run never writes it. Only the builder, local_acceptance.py gate-receipt, does. It reads files only and writes only when all of these hold:
- the steps receipt re-derives as passed;
- the plan is unchanged since the run;
- both prerequisite receipts pass;
- independent corroboration records from IB's own records, read by a session that did not start the run, pass every check of their sources and together corroborate every run claim. So a Gateway API message log record is required. A next-day IBKR activity statement record is optional and never stands alone.
  It binds the steps receipt and each record by sha256, and its claims_on_the_in_process_observer_only is always empty. Even then it only makes the gate a flip candidate; the flip stays a manual, dated commit after qualification.
Tests: 92 offline tests in tests/test_ibkr_local_acceptance.py (9 of them need the 1.231.0 runtime).

Commits. The first five come from claude/ibkr-acceptance-prep-20260925 (base ae3d3d37), cherry-picked onto main 61f9c538. Four of them have the same git patch-id --stable as their originals. 70d068e7 differs from 0395326f only in manifests/evidence.json: the added and removed lines are identical, and only the context lines differ because the base moved. The next three commits resolve the first independent review, and the last two resolve the second:

Commit	Original	Content
`51171548`	`eecb426f`	decision record
`70d068e7`	`0395326f`	runner, plans, tests, README, manifest (manifest context lines differ; see above)
`e3e74fb8`	`32762795`	fixes from the first same-family `/code-review` (high) pass
`99900bd8`	`0c8990db`	fixes from the second pass
`ee911d16`	`446833b3`	prose alignment of the plans and README
`fdd30b01`	new	first review, finding 1: `runtime-target.json`, the gate note and the decision record synced
`cf5186a8`	new	first review, findings 2 and 3: frozen latch and lock; corroboration-gated gate-receipt builder
`04f47df1`	new	README: the builder's limit on corroboration records
`1d98644f`	new	second review, findings 3 to 5: API log record required, record times bounded by the builder's clock, preflight holds the run lock (plan revision 3)
`9f39d48a`	new	second review, findings 2 and 6: the user's comparator in the decision record, `runtime-target.json` and the gate note; dated superseding paragraph in `ibkr-paper-orders/README.md`

SOTA sources

Every change builds on one of these maintained upstream sources or published references, checked on 2026-09-25:

NautilusTrader v1.231.0 (nautechsystems/nautilus_trader, the newest stable release, PyPI nautilus_trader==1.231.0). The runner drives the Python IB adapter and the engine paths below. These lines were re-read in the installed package at ~/.local/share/codex-ecosystem/tools/nautilus-1.231.0-ib:
- adapters/interactive_brokers/execution.py:209: the execution client registers venue=None.
- adapters/interactive_brokers/client/connection.py:160-186: _next_client_id, the bounded client-id fallback band after IB 326 collisions.
- adapters/interactive_brokers/client/client.py:482-516: the connection watchdog, then disconnect handling and reconnect.
- live/execution_engine.py:3549-3572: external_order_claims claims a reconciled order.
- risk/engine.pyx:1137-1149: TradingState.HALTED denies SubmitOrder and SubmitOrderList; cancels pass.
- trading/strategy.pyx:1917: events are dropped while the strategy is not RUNNING.
Official IB TWS API Python client ibapi 10.45.1 (PyPI nautilus-ibapi==10.45.1). It serves as the observer, the contender probe and the own-order cleanup client (EClient/EWrapper).
IB TWS API support page, API logs: https://interactivebrokers.github.io/tws-api/support.html. It documents "Create API Message Log File", api.[clientId].[day].log, encryption since TWS build 977, decryption "from the associated TWS or IB Gateway session", and IB Gateway's File > Gateway Logs. This page is the basis for the required corroboration source.
IBKR guide "How to Run a Statement": https://www.ibkrguides.com/clientportal/performanceandstatements/runstatement.htm. This is the basis for the optional activity-statement record.
Linux flock(2) (man-pages 6.19, 2026-02-08): https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/flock.2.html. Locks belong to an open file description, a second descriptor of the same file is denied even within one process, and LOCK_NB gives EWOULDBLOCK. Python's fcntl.flock (https://docs.python.org/3/library/fcntl.html#fcntl.flock) is the binding. This is the single-writer lock that run and now preflight take.
NautilusTrader v2.0.0rc5 (1b0a49d2; source reading only, no rc5 order was placed):
- crates/execution/src/engine/mod.rs:2222 and crates/adapters/interactive_brokers/src/execution/core.rs:491-496 (#4129) are the basis of the #4983 reclassification.
- crates/risk/src/engine/mod.rs:1218-1234 is the #4946 fail-open branch.
- Issues #4983, #5007, #5057, #5060 and #4946, PR #5041 (head 4b17ac3c, Rust ibapi =4.2.0) and develop commit ed6fc8bf.
In-repository:
- blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-paper-orders/run.py (sha256 1b697f237275a725a0dcc39ee886c4f07aa27bfba1c2b442982b3c76b02e1012, unchanged). It is the reviewed harness the runner reuses for redaction, the official-ibapi check, prices, budget, session window and node config.
- docs/acceptance-evidence-policy.md:42-53 (discriminating controls) and :65-69 (a wrapper's own passed is not independent confirmation). These are the rules the gate-receipt builder enforces.

Second independent review: findings resolved

The second independent review returned fix_required with seven findings: three major, three minor, and one note for the coordinator.

No SOTA sources section, plus three evidence errors in this body (major). Fixed in this body:
- The section above is added. The sota-sources check result on a merge ref against current main is under "Checks run".
- (a) The full-suite row now gives the argv that passes on this host, ECOSYSTEM_JOB_SECONDS=1500 ecosystem-bounded-run rtk proxy python3 -m unittest, with its result at the new head. Without rtk proxy the job inherits SIGINT ignored, and 11 SIGINT tests fail.
- (b) The privacy row lists every synthetic hit.
- (c) The commits paragraph gives the exact patch-id result.
The records named rc5 as the comparison arm, not the user's comparator (major). Fixed in 9f39d48a:
- The decision record quotes user decision 3 verbatim, with its provenance.
- The title, the Decision section, alternative 1, comparison 2 and item 3 name the first 2.0.x release (not a dev wheel) containing #5041. Item 3 has no rc5 arm, and the rc5 probe (item 1) is optional evidence for the #4983 reclassification only. A new item 4 sends any other trigger to a new user decision.
- A dated 23:21Z update supersedes the 21:23Z statement that comparison 2 needs a release carrying the #4946 fix.
- runtime-target.json local_broker_acceptance_scope names the comparator and the #4983 basis no longer calls the rc5 probe an overturn comparison. The gate note's dated paragraph names the comparator.
- Both plans' engine.note name it (revision 3; the post plan is regenerated).
An activity statement alone still wrote status passed (major). Fixed in 1d98644f:
- Plan revision 3 preregisters required_sources: ["gateway_api_message_log"], run_claims, every_run_claim_corroborated: true and a required flag per source. validate_plan holds these equal to CORROBORATION_SOURCES and the new REQUIRED_CORROBORATION_SOURCES.
- The builder refuses refused_claims_uncorroborated and writes nothing. It names the missing sources and the claims that would rest on the in-process observer.
- gate_receipt() itself raises for statement-only records.
- The README table marks the API log required and the statement optional.
- The statement-only test now expects the refusal, with the discriminating control of the same statement plus an API log record passing.
Record times had no upper bound (minor). Fixed in 1d98644f:
- The builder refuses any source.retrieved_at or observer.observed_at later than its own clock plus 300 s. The limit is preregistered as max_future_skew_seconds.
- The tests refuse an API log record dated 30 days after the run, a record whose observed_at alone is ahead, and a same-day statement dated tomorrow. A record at exactly the 300 s edge passes, and the same records pass once the builder's clock is past them.
preflight ignored the run lock (minor). Fixed in 1d98644f, one step beyond the suggested probe:
- preflight takes the frozen lock without blocking before it connects and holds it until it finishes, then re-reads the latch under the lock. So a preflight during a run is refused as refused_concurrent_run and connects nothing, and a run started during a preflight is refused too.
- The tests hold the lock (preflight refused with no connection). They also probe the lock from inside preflight's check (held) and run after preflight (passes). A further test engages the latch at lock time (refused).
ibkr-paper-orders/README.md kept the stale #4983 and version-selection text (minor). Fixed in 9f39d48a with a dated 2026-09-25 paragraph that supersedes both. The decision record's list of files citing the #4983 text now includes it.
Coordinator notes (no change in this PR), confirmed:
- This PR touches no file under adaptive-paper/ or order-contract/. runner.py f157be18, safety.py 7e00d5bb, transport.py 2653682b and order_contract.py 57405f75 are identical at ae3d3d37, at this head and at main. source-hashes.json is d14c8d72 at ae3d3d37 and here, and 075dab0e on main after Paper alert: scrape only registered adaptive-paper exporters, and alert only on a registered silent one #284. Whether Paper alert: scrape only registered adaptive-paper exporters, and alert only on a registered silent one #284 breaks the engine-M freeze is the coordinator's decision.
- The prep worktree steps are stale; see the user steps below.
- The full-suite argv is in "Checks run".

The fixes from both reviews have not yet had their own independent review, and a cross-family (Codex) review has not run on this PR.

First independent review: findings resolved

The first independent review raised three minor findings on this PR, and all three are fixed. That review ran raw on scratch clones at the PR heads and found no blocker or major finding.

Stale canonical records (runtime-target.json:62-75, the gate note). Fixed in fdd30b01:
- #4983 moved from rc5_blockers to rc5_reclassified_reports as a stale v1.227.0 report for rc5.
- #5007, #5057, #5060 and #4946 are listed as the rc5 obstacles.
- pin_update now reads =4.2.0.
- A dated paragraph was added to the gate note.
Latch and lock per --state-dir. Fixed in cf5186a8: both moved to the frozen per-account CONTROL_DIR. A legacy latch still counts as engaged, and run re-reads the latch under the lock.
The flip rested on the runner's own receipt and its in-process observer. Fixed in cf5186a8 by the corroboration-gated builder, which 1d98644f tightens.

What the user has to do (the steps the run is waiting on)

Run from this PR's head (9f39d48a or later). Do not use the earlier prep worktree /home/seath/code/ibkr-acceptance-20260925 (446833b3): its runner keeps the latch under --state-dir, and its run writes receipt.json directly.

Start the paper IB Gateway: ~/ibc/start-paper-gateway.sh, or IB Gateway 10.50 with IB API and Paper Trading. Sign in with the paper username and approve the second factor.
In API settings:
- Read-Only API off. IBC re-applies a non-empty ReadOnlyApi at every start, and the 2026-09-22 handbook recorded ReadOnlyApi=yes. Set it to no, or leave it empty and untick the box.
- Socket port 4002.
- Localhost / 127.0.0.1 only.
- Master API client ID empty, or outside 93 to 98.
- Create API message log file: on, before the run. The Gateway then writes api.<clientId>.<weekday>.log. This is the required corroboration source: without it no gate receipt can be built for the run.
Sign out of every competing session of the same username.
From the repository root, with ENV=$HOME/.local/share/codex-ecosystem/tools/nautilus-1.231.0-ib and RUNNER=blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-acceptance/local_acceptance.py:
- "$ENV/bin/python" "$RUNNER" preflight --port 4002 is read-only and should print "status": "ready".
- Then "$ENV/bin/python" "$RUNNER" run --port 4002 --enable-paper-orders --receipt blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-acceptance/evidence/local-acceptance-$(date -u +%Y%m%dT%H%MZ).json.
- Timing: a regular-session run starts by about 15:23 ET. After 16:00, add --plan local-acceptance-plan-post.json to both commands; the latest start is then about 19:23 ET.
After the run the latch stays engaged by design, for every --state-dir. Check it with "$ENV/bin/python" "$RUNNER" kill-switch status, then clear it with kill-switch clear --confirm --reason 'reviewed run <run_prefix>'. Commit the steps receipt.
Corroboration, by a session that did not start the run (README "Independent corroboration"). Decrypt the API message logs of client ids 93 and 98 from the same Gateway session and keep them private, then commit the API log corroboration record. Optionally also retrieve the next-day Daily Activity statement and commit its record. Then run "$ENV/bin/python" "$RUNNER" gate-receipt --steps-receipt <steps receipt> --corroboration <api log record> [--corroboration <statement record>]. It must run after the records' retrieval times. Commit receipt.json with the records for independent qualification.

The Nautilus console is not redacted and prints the account id, so do not save or commit it. The raw API logs and statements contain the account id too; only their sha256 goes into a record.

Evidence

File	sha256	Evidence class
`blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-acceptance/local_acceptance.py`	`4a8e60667b2c0d0d3d35ff7680c2f04c2e0839f338f7ff6db0599a6b13f643ae`	code; offline tests only
`.../ibkr-acceptance/local-acceptance-plan.json` (revision 3)	`fb632e2579d5eafc069bec73964b846166d6dfb40e67e0b87e50c18c8300faf9`	frozen plan
`.../ibkr-acceptance/local-acceptance-plan-post.json` (revision 3)	`71d82aec70e32217bd599c2b646899ab52608254dfa0024bc164e923cb8fab17`	frozen plan (after hours)
`.../ibkr-acceptance/README.md`	`bed2a887031f97ba105f1d20a819d1b8042a716e6f9531ea309b16373f3f8239`	runbook
`docs/decisions/2026-09-25-ibkr-local-acceptance-version-selection.md`	`a16b3d576ba6619cd191b7075d8e7d31490d5de2a2f118f194bf6fac389dc570`	decision record (keep-but-compare)
`catalogs/us-equities/runtime-target.json`	`2b33d328e31cc50c902120f26706ae56109f57f94cdc9da0a37d560f5917cecb`	catalog; upstream source reading
`catalogs/us-equities/gates-20260922.json`	`01f4283dacee5a38dee06c25872d3b5ad7e1df1d12d9509e398e4326e2984266`	gate note only; status unchanged
`.../ibkr-paper-orders/README.md`	`3fbfa279152341f49bcd50658ebebe52dbfa8ed146565da3f1aa2725f889453b`	runbook; dated superseding paragraph only
`tests/test_ibkr_local_acceptance.py`	`bdbb103dd8e27b4fbafc716ad1e83579a29701913198fd2123c42f6e39ecb08b`	synthetic offline fixture
`.../ibkr-paper-orders/run.py` (shared, unchanged)	`1b697f237275a725a0dcc39ee886c4f07aa27bfba1c2b442982b3c76b02e1012`	n/a
Prerequisite `.../ibkr-acceptance/evidence/ibapi-readonly-20260923.json` (status passed, unchanged)	`af4d968cf9d6508883b53ac80f1532d3b888188000c6173fbd3f725447f56756`	native_paper (2026-09-23)
Prerequisite `.../ibkr-paper-orders/evidence/receipt-20260923-passed.json` (status passed, unchanged)	`e813c655d664966a6910926d284887815d933ac81d0552d2c985aadbdb5d43dc`	native_paper (2026-09-23)
Steps receipt, corroboration records, gate `receipt.json`	none; not run	none

Broker state: not applicable. No broker API call was made, no Gateway was started and no IB order was placed or cancelled. The Alpaca paper accounts were not touched by this PR. The frozen control directory does not exist on this host (no run, no latch, no preflight against a Gateway).

Upstream check (gh api, 2026-09-25T21:23Z; source reading and inference, not observed; not repeated for the second review):

nautilus_trader#4983 is open with 0 comments, filed 2026-09-12 against v1.227.0. At tag v2.0.0rc5 (1b0a49d2) the engine denies only when client.handles_order_venue is false (crates/execution/src/engine/mod.rs:2222), and the Rust IB execution client returns true (crates/adapters/interactive_brokers/src/execution/core.rs:491-496, #4129, merged 2026-05-25). So #4983 is a stale v1.227.0 report for rc5. No rc5 stock order has been tried on this host.
PR #5041 is open and unmerged, mergeable_state dirty, head 4b17ac3c, +22,773/-11,740 across 123 files, body sha256 050141af…. Its root Cargo.toml moves Rust ibapi from =3.3.0 to =4.2.0. It lists #5007, #5057, #5060, #4946, #4970, #4564, #4932 and others as covered.
#5007 (open, rc5), #5057 (open, rc6.dev and rc5), #5060 (open, rc5 and develop) and #4946 (closed 2026-09-25T11:03:11Z by develop commit ed6fc8bf; the fail-open branch is at crates/risk/src/engine/mod.rs:1218-1234 at rc5) are the rc5 obstacles now in runtime-target.json rc5_blockers.
The newest release is v2.0.0rc5 (prerelease). The newest stable release is v1.231.0. No release contains #5041 or ed6fc8bf.
IB's API-log statements were re-read on 2026-09-25 for this revision (support page above). The Gateway 10.50 export steps and the paper account's activity statements are not verified here.
The 1.231.0 backtest caught a real bug before any run. Strategy.handle_event drops events while the strategy is not RUNNING (trading/strategy.pyx:1917), so a denial raised in on_start was lost. The first case now starts on the first timer tick, and a regression test covers it.

Checks run

All checks ran at branch head 9f39d48a (1d98644f plus the records commit 9f39d48a), each prefixed with rtk proxy. Two rows ran on the working tree before the commit split: the first full suite and the mutation row. The mutation row covers the runner and tests, which are unchanged since. Every other row, including the second full suite, ran at the head.

Command	Result
`python3 scripts/validate.py`	rc 0: `{"components": 69, "hashed_files": 5617, "profiles": 4, "receipts": 147, "status": "passed"}`
`python3 scripts/validate_catalogs.py`	rc 0
`python3 scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check`	rc 0: `{"files": 5617, "status": "passed"}`
`python3 scripts/trading_gates.py --check`	rc 0: status passed, errors [], flip_candidates []. Live blockers: leverage-ladder-1x/2x/4x, ibkr-local-acceptance, live-go.
`~/.local/share/codex-ecosystem/tools/nautilus-1.231.0-ib/bin/python -m unittest tests.test_ibkr_local_acceptance tests.test_ibkr_paper_orders tests.test_ibkr_acceptance`	196 tests, OK
`python3 -m unittest tests.test_ibkr_local_acceptance tests.test_ibkr_paper_orders tests.test_ibkr_acceptance tests.test_validate tests.test_trading_gates tests.test_evidence_manifest tests.test_catalogs`	331 tests, OK (22 skipped)
`python3 -m unittest` over the other modules that read these catalogs (`test_adaptive_market_research`, `test_blind_checkout`, `test_catalog_freshness_trading`, `test_ecosystem_manifest`, `test_lane_packets`, `test_mover_early_entry_rules`, `test_mover_early_entry_stats`, `test_sota_convergence`)	456 tests, OK (38 skipped)
`ECOSYSTEM_JOB_SECONDS=1500 ecosystem-bounded-run rtk proxy python3 -m unittest` (full suite; exact argv, run from the worktree root)	Head `9f39d48a`: 5479 tests OK (637 skipped), rc 0, 23:31:05Z to 23:36:37Z. Working tree before the split: 5479 OK (637 skipped), rc 0. Without the inner `rtk proxy`, the job inherits SIGINT ignored, and 11 SIGINT tests fail (second review, finding 7c).
Discriminating mutations on a scratch copy of the runner and tests (each fix disabled in turn, then `GateReceiptBuilder`, `RunCommand`, `PlanValidation` and `SourceSafety` re-run)	Claim-coverage refusal removed: 2 failures (the statement-only test and the receipt-function test). Future-time bound removed: 1 failure. Preflight without the lock: 3 failures. Preflight without the latch re-read: 1 failure. `validate_plan` without the revision-3 rules: 7 subtest failures. Restored: OK.
`uvx pyflakes==3.4.0 .../local_acceptance.py tests/test_ibkr_local_acceptance.py`	rc 0, no findings
`python3 scripts/host_receipts.py validate`, `component_matrix.py --check`, `new_host_grand_list.py --check`, `build_ecosystem.py --check`	rc 0 each (98 receipts; 32 rows; 32 layers, 66 winners; passed)
`gitleaks git --log-opts="origin/main..HEAD" --no-banner --redact --exit-code 1 .` (guarded ecosystem gitleaks 8.30.1)	rc 0: 10 commits, about 370 KB scanned, no leaks, no warnings, no exclusions
Offline CLI refusals under the 1.231.0 runtime: `kill-switch status`, `kill-switch clear` without `--confirm`, `run` without `--enable-paper-orders`, `preflight --port 4001`, `gate-receipt` outside the repository and without `--corroboration`	`{"engaged": false}`; `refused_not_confirmed`; `refused_orders_not_enabled`; `refused_live_port`; `refused_outside_repository`; argparse exit 2. Nothing connected. The real control directory was absent before and after, and no `receipt.json` exists.
Head `9f39d48a` merged with origin/main `efa32d92` (`git merge-tree --write-tree`, clean; tree `344a1135`), extracted to a scratch directory: `validate.py`, `evidence_manifest.py --check`, `trading_gates.py --check`, `validate_catalogs.py`, and `tests.test_ibkr_local_acceptance`, `test_validate`, `test_trading_gates`, `test_evidence_manifest`	rc 0 each (5746 hashed files, 149 receipts; flip_candidates []); 180 tests OK (9 skipped)
Commit `1d98644f` alone (archive extracted): `validate.py`, `evidence_manifest.py --check`, `trading_gates.py --check`	rc 0 each
Privacy grep of every added line, merge-base `61f9c538` to the head, manifest excluded (5,606 lines; home paths, the account-id pattern, UUIDs, IPv4, e-mail, key-like assignments, AWS and GitHub token shapes)	Only synthetic fixtures, all in `tests/test_ibkr_local_acceptance.py`: account ids `<ib-paper-account>`, `U1234567` (4 matches), `<ib-paper-account>` (3), `<ib-paper-account>` and `<ib-paper-account>`; the address `10.0.0.2` (2); and the path `/home/example/private/api.93.Fri.log`. The loopback `127.0.0.1` appears in the runner, plans and README. There are no UUIDs, keys or tokens (one e-mail pattern match is the decorator `@unittest.skipUnless`).

GitHub CI at 9f39d48a ran on merge ref 6a19f6b1, which merges main efa32d92, including #294's 7bbb021e, with this head. Its tree 344a1135 is the merged tree checked locally above. Results: 22 passed, 3 skipped by design (osv-sarif-upload, zizmor-online, zizmor-sarif-upload) and 0 failed.

sota-sources passed for the first time on this PR: "SOTA sources section present (3236 characters)" (run 36201772505, job 108290468046).
Also passed: validate, validate-macos, secret-scan, verdict-review-gate, token-report, dependency-review, osv-scanner, CodeQL and every Analyze job, nautilus-offline-replay, bootstrap-linux, bootstrap-macos, bootstrap-macos-brew, changes and both Socket checks.
The description edit made before the push started validate run 36201755750 on the old head, and the push's run cancelled it (same concurrency group).
Adding these results to the description re-runs the validate workflow on the same head.

Limits and follow-ups

Independent review so far: two same-family forked /code-review (high) passes, then two independent reviews whose findings are resolved above. The fixes to the second review's findings have not been independently reviewed yet, and a cross-family (Codex) review has not run.
Every run-level result is unobserved. The tests are synthetic offline fixtures plus a simulated-ARCA BacktestEngine under 1.231.0; none of them is IBKR evidence. The corroboration records in the tests are synthetic.
The first real run has to confirm these inferences:
- IB keeps working API DAY orders across a client disconnect.
- reqCompletedOrders(apiOnly) on client 98 lists other clients' cancelled API orders. If it does not, the after-B checkpoint fails loudly instead of passing.
- IB answers 326 to a duplicate client id without dropping the node's connection.
- The Gateway's API message log can be decrypted from the same session on Gateway 10.50. That is now required for a gate receipt, so a run without a readable log cannot flip the gate. Whether IBKR issues a daily activity statement for the paper account is optional evidence.
The builder checks a corroboration record's structure, bindings and times against its own clock, not the private raw files it names. Its checks are the corroborating session's statement, re-checkable against the files' sha256, and a wrong system clock on the builder's host would move the 300 s bound.
Run files default to ~/.local/state/native-agent-stack/ibkr-local-acceptance; --state-dir moves them but not the latch or the lock. The account id reaches the phase processes only through a same-user environment variable.
The comparator arm (the first 2.0.x release containing #5041) has no date. The 1.231.0 selection stays keep-but-compare until it runs.

Not established by this PR

The ibkr-local-acceptance gate: not_established, no receipt, no flip.
Any IBKR order behaviour on 1.231.0 or rc5 (steps 2 to 4), any live configuration, and live-go (user decision, untouched).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… (keep-but-compare) Dated version-selection record for the ibkr-local-acceptance gate: local acceptance runs on NautilusTrader 1.231.0's Python IB adapter (official ibapi 10.45.1), with the pinned 2.0.0rc5 Rust adapter kept as the comparison arm until a release carrying PR #5041 (or fixes for #4983, #5057 and #5060) passes the same frozen case set. Upstream checked with gh api at 2026-09-25T18:21Z: #4983 open (filed against v1.227.0); PR #5041 open, unmerged, dirty, under maintainer review, now pinning ibapi =4.2.0; newest release v2.0.0rc5, newest stable v1.231.0. Source check (not observed): the rc5 IB execution client already overrides handles_order_venue (#4129), so the #4983 denial is unconfirmed for rc5; an rc5 stock-order probe is named as the first comparison. No gate status changes; live-go stays a user decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…lans and offline tests blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-acceptance/local_acceptance.py runs the acceptance-plan section 5 cases the 2026-09-23 paper-order receipt left open, on NautilusTrader 1.231.0's own IB execution engine, in three fresh-process TradingNode phases on client id 93 with an independent official-ibapi observer on client 98: - A1-A4: resting R1 accepted; client-id ownership (contender refused with IB 326, observer maps orderRef/orderId/permId onto the node's order); reconnect with R1 working (socket shut down, adapter reconnects on id 93, R1 still working, IB-confirmed cancel); R2 left working. - B1-B2: restart reconciliation adopts R2 (external_order_claims); kill switch writes a durable latch, sets the RiskEngine HALTED, P1 denied locally, R2 cancelled at IB. - C1: a second restart honours the latch before the node runs; P2 denied. Refuses by default: no connection without --enable-paper-orders; live ports 4001/7496 and any non-paper port; non-DU or multi-account gateways, existing positions/orders, a busy client id, an engaged latch, a concurrent run, missing prerequisites, an unpinned runtime and starts outside the session window. Resting BUY limits only (max 4 orders, 2 reaching IB); no marketable or flattening order. Leftovers of the run are cancelled through ibapi on the node id only after the phase process exits. The preregistered gate receipt (native_ibkr_local_acceptance) is written only when every case and checkpoint passed and both prerequisite receipts exist with status passed; the flip stays a manual dated commit. The README gains the exact user steps (paper Gateway via IBC or ~/Jts, 2FA, Read-Only API off, port 4002, 127.0.0.1, empty master client id) and the preflight/run commands. A regular-session and an after-hours plan are frozen before any run. Offline tests: 58 (plain python3: 50 run, 8 skipped; NautilusTrader 1.231.0 runtime: 58 run, including a BacktestEngine flow with the real 1.231.0 RiskEngine HALTED denial). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Findings from a /code-review (high) pass on 0395326f, each supported by the code and fixed here: - The after-B and final checkpoints now require IB's completed-orders list to show R1 and R2 cancelled; before, an empty or partial list let "P1/P2 never reached IB" pass vacuously. - ibapi cleanup is observer-guided and never reports none_open from an incomplete listing: the check id lists the run's open orders and their holders, each holder inside the adapter's fallback band (93-97) cancels its own, and a final complete observation decides. - The plan hash is bound at run start; the parent stops before a phase if the plan file changed, and each phase re-checks the same hash. - A3 passes only after the adapter itself recorded a disconnection after the fault (_last_disconnection_ns); a transient not-ready is not enough. - Deadlines: 15 s phase slack (build, first-tick start, watchdog granularity) and a worst_case_seconds() bound that counts process graces, cleanup rounds and observer retries; overall 1,500 s (worst case 1,445 s), so a regular-session run starts by about 15:25 ET. - A gate receipt needs a steps receipt inside the repository; a failed gate write is recorded in the steps receipt. - Provisional phase results are written without fsync on the event loop. - _dec, is_gate_receipt and the paper-account latch come from the shared ibkr-paper-orders harness. Offline tests: 67 (NautilusTrader 1.231.0 runtime: 67 run, OK; plain python3: 58 run, 9 skipped, OK). validate.py and the evidence manifest check pass; trading_gates.py --check lists no flip candidate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

A second /code-review (high) pass on 32762795 found issues in the first round of fixes; each was supported by the code and is fixed here: - The completed-orders requirement applies only once a probe was attempted (P1 in phase B, P2 in phase C), so a run stopped in phase A ends incomplete instead of failed. - worst_case_seconds counts up to min(fallback band, max_orders) holder ids per cancel round and every observation the cleanup may make; overall_deadline_seconds is now 1,620 s (worst case 1,575 s), latest regular-session start about 15:23 ET. - A plan file that cannot be read mid-run counts as changed: the runner stops before the next phase and still cleans up. - run refuses a steps receipt outside the repository before connecting (refused_receipt_outside_repository); prerequisites and the receipt location are judged against the same repository root. - A failed gate write leaves gate_receipt {eligible: false, reason: gate_receipt_write_failed} with one error field. - A failed cleanup observation no longer uses up a cancel round, and the cleanup takes its observer by keyword like the rest of the runner. - The observer inherits the shared paper-account latch from CheckState instead of calling it unbound; the shared gate-path check raises instead of relying on assert. - README states the deadline and worst-case figures separately. Offline tests: 71 in the new module; all three IBKR modules 175 (NautilusTrader 1.231.0: 175 run, OK; plain python3: 153 run, 22 skipped, OK). validate.py and the evidence manifest check pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…ewed runner Prose only, before any run: the plans' failure disposition now describes the observer-guided cleanup over the adapter's fallback band (93-97) instead of client 93 alone, the kill-switch clear needs --reason, and the final checkpoint requires R1 and R2 listed cancelled once a probe was attempted. The README lists every gate-receipt condition (the version-selection record and an in-repository steps receipt included). No code or bound changes; both plans still differ only in the session. Checks: validate.py and the manifest order check pass; the three IBKR test modules pass (NautilusTrader 1.231.0: 175 OK; plain python3 with tests.test_validate: 232 run, 22 skipped, OK). The full suite ran on the parent commit 0c8990db: 5380 tests OK, 637 skipped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…ction record Resolves the first minor finding of the first independent review of PR #280: after merge, catalogs/us-equities/runtime-target.json and the ibkr-local-acceptance gate note contradicted the PR's own decision record. - runtime-target.json: #4983 moves from rc5_blockers to rc5_reclassified_reports as a stale v1.227.0 report for rc5. At tag v2.0.0rc5 (1b0a49d2) crates/execution/src/engine/mod.rs:2222 denies only when handles_order_venue is false, and the IB execution client returns true (crates/adapters/interactive_brokers/src/execution/core.rs:491-496, #4129, merged 2026-05-25, after v1.227.0). rc5_blockers now lists the rc5 obstacles on the recovery and risk paths, each with state, version and source: #5007, #5057 and #5060 (open, listed as covered by #5041) and #4946 (fail-open account-scoped risk checks at crates/risk/src/engine/mod.rs:1218-1234 at rc5; closed 2026-09-25 by develop commit ed6fc8bf, in no release). upstream_ibapi_pin.pin_update now says #5041 pins =4.2.0 (head 4b17ac3c, Cargo.toml diff), not =4.1.0. The scope text no longer says that no dated version-selection record exists. - gates-20260922.json: a dated paragraph opens the ibkr-local-acceptance note and supersedes its #4983 and =4.1.0 statements; status, flip condition and every other gate are unchanged. - The decision record gets a dated update with the same re-check and #4946. Upstream state from gh api at 2026-09-25T21:23Z; source reading, no rc5 order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

… a corroboration-gated builder Resolves the second and third minor findings of the first independent review of PR #280, before any run of local_acceptance.py. Latch and lock (finding 2): the kill-switch latch, its audit log and the single-writer run lock lived under --state-dir, so a run with another state directory did not see an engaged latch. They now live in one frozen per-account directory, CONTROL_DIR: the account's home directory from the password database (not $HOME, XDG_STATE_HOME or --state-dir) plus .local/state/native-agent-stack/ibkr-local-acceptance. Latch, audit and lock are 0600, the directory 0700. A latch file an earlier revision wrote under a state directory also reads as engaged and 'kill-switch clear' removes it. run reads the latch again once it holds the lock. Tests: a latch engaged with one state directory refuses run and preflight with others, a held lock refuses a run with another state directory, the legacy latch, the TOCTOU re-check, and the path ignoring HOME and XDG_STATE_HOME. Corroboration (finding 3): the run's status is its own result and its observer uses the same official ibapi library as the adapter, so neither is independent confirmation (docs/acceptance-evidence-policy.md). run now writes the steps receipt only, with gate_receipt awaiting independent_corroboration and a finished_at time. The new 'gate-receipt' subcommand is the only writer of receipt.json. It reads files only and refuses (exit 3, nothing written) unless the steps receipt re-derives as passed, the plan is unchanged since the run, the prerequisites pass, and at least one corroboration record from IB's own records passes every check of its source: the Gateway API message log (corroborates every run claim) or the next-day IBKR activity statement (no fill, flat). A record binds the run prefix and the steps receipt's path and sha256, names the private raw files by sha256, is retrieved and observed after the run by a separate session that did not start it, and carries no account id or home path. The gate receipt binds each record and lists the claims that rest on the in-process observer alone. Both plans move to revision 2 with the new latch/lock text and a preregistered corroboration block that validate_plan holds equal to the builder's; bounds, cases, phases, checkpoints and timeouts are unchanged, and the after-hours plan is regenerated from the regular one. The README documents the steps (switch the API message log on before the run). Offline tests only; no Gateway, connection or order. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

The gate-receipt builder checks a corroboration record's structure, bindings and times but cannot read the private raw files, so the record's checks remain the corroborating session's statement, re-checkable against the files' sha256 by anyone who holds them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…ecord times; preflight holds the run lock Second independent review of PR #280, findings 3 to 5 (plan revision 3, still before any run): - Finding 3: an activity statement alone no longer makes a gate receipt. Orders rest at half the bid, so no fill and a flat account are expected whether or not the kill switch worked. CORROBORATION_SOURCES marks the Gateway API message log required and the statement optional; the builder refuses refused_claims_uncorroborated (nothing written) unless the checked records include every required source and corroborate every run claim, and gate_receipt() raises on the same condition. The plans preregister required_sources, run_claims, every_run_claim_corroborated and a required flag per source; validate_plan holds them equal to the builder's constants. - Finding 4: a record's retrieved_at or observed_at later than the builder's clock plus 300 s (max_future_skew_seconds, preregistered) is refused; cmd_gate_receipt takes a now_fn hook. - Finding 5: preflight takes the frozen run lock without blocking before it connects and holds it until it finishes, re-reading the latch under the lock, so a preflight during a run and a run during a preflight are both refused (refused_concurrent_run). - Both plans' engine.note name the user's comparator (the first 2.0.x release containing nautilus_trader#5041); the post plan is regenerated from the regular plan. Tests: 92 in tests/test_ibkr_local_acceptance.py (89 before), with discriminating controls; mutations disabling each fix fail the new tests. README and manifest entries updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…stale #4983 text Second independent review of PR #280, findings 2 and 6: - Finding 2: the decision record quotes user decision 3 of 2026-09-25 verbatim ("NautilusTrader 1.231.0 + ibapi 10.45.1 for local acceptance, keep-but-compare against the first 2.0.x release containing nautilus_trader PR #5041") and names that release (not a dev wheel) as the comparator in the title, the Decision section, alternative 1 and the overturn comparisons. The rc5 stock-order probe is optional evidence for the #4983 reclassification only, item 3 has no rc5 arm, and any other trigger needs a new user decision. A dated update supersedes the 21:23Z statement that comparison 2 needs a release carrying the #4946 fix. runtime-target.json local_broker_acceptance_scope and the #4983 basis, and the dated paragraph of the ibkr-local-acceptance gate note, match. Gate status and flip condition are unchanged. - Finding 6: ibkr-paper-orders/README.md gets a dated 2026-09-25 paragraph superseding its version-selection sentence and its #4983 statement; the decision record lists the file among those that cited the issue text. Manifest entries recomputed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-09-26T01:24:27Z

Upstream facts for the IBKR lane (relayed by the trading-lane coordinator, 2026-09-26; from the workstation SOTA sweep's catalog-freshness run 36205743492):

nautechsystems/nautilus_ibapi is archived upstream. main's blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-acceptance/README.md installs nautilus-ibapi. This PR uses the official ibapi 10.45.1, as NautilusTrader 1.231.0's adapter does, so the archived package matters here only if a step still installs it.
wboayue/rust-ibapi is pinned at 3.3.0, and upstream is at 4.2.0. The notice-2188 fix cited in runtime-target.json (rust-ibapi#764, fixed by fix: relock production dependencies and preserve captured evidence #765) shipped in v4.0.0, so the pinned 3.3.0 predates it.

These are facts only. No change is requested before the user's IB Gateway sign-in.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…und, lane limit 12 Regenerated once with the pipeline of the earlier rounds, on the tools of 7760b1da, so the manifest sha changes once. - Usage: the three usage records were re-measured with child-usage.mjs at 7760b1da (sha256 85b95813...730d). Each child_usage is identical to the 1bd2416b measurement: wf_8397ada1-777 stays complete (none of its 8 superseded attempts holds uncounted usage) and run 1 stays incomplete, so lower_bound_usage and every ledger outcome are unchanged. Only tool_commit, tool_sha256 and measured_at_utc changed. - Lane limit 12, a dated correction from the trading lane's review of #357: the execution-broker proposal of wboayue/rust-ibapi (a re-pin through nautilus_trader PR #5041) attributes #4983 to rc5. Checked with gh api: #4983's body reports Version v1.227.0; 1b0a49d2 is identical to tag v2.0.0rc5, and there crates/adapters/interactive_brokers/src/execution/ core.rs:493-495 overrides handles_order_venue to return true, so the ClientVenueMismatch denial behind crates/execution/src/engine/mod.rs:2222 cannot fire for the IB client; the open PR #280 reclassifies #4983 in catalogs/us-equities/runtime-target.json. Read instead: rc5 IBKR execution is unqualified (no rc5 stock order observed). The proposal text is kept. - convert.py with limits 1-12: exit 3 on the same two notes, summary identical. returns.json and layers.json are byte-identical; lanes.json and manifest-20260926.json differ only by the added limit (pin ids unchanged: 60 occurrences, 39 distinct). - make_result.py with the per-worker, per-layer coverage check passes on this record and gives the same RESULT.json. - Ledger: both 2026-09-26 records were re-appended onto origin/main's ledger (803bc35, unchanged since 3822178). Only manifest_sha256, usage_sha256 and the chain hashes changed. - README and independent-review.json: the third review round (GPT-6-Astra, NOT_READY, two P2 findings, both reproduced and repaired in 7760b1da) and the trading lane's correction. Verification, with a simulated registration of the 18 changed registered files: saturation_ledger.py --check --base origin/main passes (4 records, chain intact) and scripts/validate.py passes. Tests: tests.test_saturation_ledger, tests.test_landscape_sweep_harness, tests.test_adoption_docs_consistency and tests.test_verdict_lane_vendoring 198 run, OK (3 skipped: no bash 3.2, no shellcheck, no profile coverage change); test-child-usage.mjs 51 passed; tests.test_gitleaks_config 27 OK. manifests/evidence.json is not edited; the coordinator registers the changed files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

…est-20260926 for the verdict wave (11 lane limits) (#357) * Landscape-sweep usage: measure runs past 64 KiB, re-run calls and effort deviations Recording the 2026-09-26 sweep (wf_8397ada1-777, 201 agents) exposed three gaps in the packaged harness for a run it legitimately produced: - child-usage.mjs printed its summary and then called process.exit(), which drops stdout writes still pending on a pipe. usage_record.py captures stdout through a pipe, so any run whose summary exceeds 64 KiB was cut at exactly 65,536 bytes and failed to parse (184,831 bytes for this run). It now sets process.exitCode instead, as the Node.js process.exit() documentation advises. - At a Claude usage limit the Workflow paused and re-ran its 8 waiting agents after the reset under the same journal key ("Re-running 8 waiting agents"). child-usage.mjs counted each earlier attempt as an incomplete child, so a run in which every call returned read as incomplete, and convert.py measured those votes from the failed attempt ("<synthetic>+claude-opus-5-5"). child-usage.mjs now lists an attempt that returned nothing and whose key started again under superseded_attempts (with superseded_by), keeps its issues and effort check, and still counts its usage in by_resolved_model; convert.py takes the attempt that returned and never names <synthetic>. - A worker measured at another effort than max (here a pinned skill with `effort: low` frontmatter lowered the final turn of three workers) made make_result.py refuse the whole record. convert.py --usage now records each such worker as an effort_deviation retained failure of its layer (the critic's of every layer), which reopens the layer; make_result.py accepts the usage only when every deviation is recorded so. Tests: new cases in test-child-usage.mjs and tests/test_landscape_sweep_harness.py fail on 3822178 and pass here; SHA256SUMS updated for the two changed files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape-sweep source reviews: review a Hugging Face model survivor at its Hub commit The 2026-09-26 sweep (wf_8397ada1-777) kept a Hugging Face model repository in agents-models-workers (https://huggingface.co/XingChen-AGI/Xing4.0-29B-A4B), a legitimate survivor of a model layer. source_reviews.py read only GitHub through gh api, refused it as "not a GitHub repository URL", and make_result.py then refused the record for a survivor without a source review. source_reviews.py now reviews a Hugging Face model repository at the commit of its default revision. The Hub's model-info endpoint /api/models/<repo_id> (the endpoint huggingface_hub's HfApi.model_info calls, checked at huggingface_hub main 62a1f2fa8383) gives the commit, the card license and the repository state. The model card is read at that commit through the documented "Resolve a file" endpoint (https://huggingface.co/.well-known/openapi.json), anonymously, and its YAML metadata block is not excerpted. The review is named hf-<namespace>-<name>.json. A Hub dataset or Space URL is still reported and skipped. The GitHub path is unchanged apart from sharing the excerpt helper. Test: SourceReviewTests.test_a_hugging_face_model_survivor_is_reviewed_at_its_hub_commit (stubbed Hub fetch, no network) fails before this change and passes with it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Saturation ledger test: derive the seed-only state from the two seed records test_no_seed_layer_counts_as_clean asserted that no layer of the whole committed ledger counts as clean. That held while the ledger held only the 2026-09-23 seed records; a later completed sweep with clean layers (landscape-sweep-20260926 leaves agent-sdks, backtesting-engine and token-efficiency at 1) is its own evidence and made the whole-ledger assertion false. The test now derives the state from the two seed records, which is what its name and the seed checks around it assert. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape-sweep source reviews: repairs from the independent review An independent headless review (claude -p, Opus, read-only) of the Hugging Face support found three low-severity defects. Each is now covered by SourceReviewTests.test_hub_reviews_survive_truncated_responses_trailing_slashes_and_indented_card_metadata, which fails on the previous code and passes here: - hub_get caught URLError, OSError and ValueError, but http.client.HTTPException (IncompleteRead, BadStatusLine) is not an OSError. One truncated Hub response therefore aborted the whole run with a traceback before any review was written. It is now a HubError and is reported and skipped like any other. - Survivors were grouped by sweep_common.slug(), which keeps a Hugging Face URL whole, so the same model with and without a trailing slash got two reviews. repository_key() now groups a model as hf:<namespace>/<name>. make_result.py matches a review to a survivor as the ledger compares repositories (no trailing slash, lowercased), so it finds the review either way. - The card's YAML metadata block was stripped only when the card began with "---". It now uses huggingface_hub's repocard.REGEX_YAML_BLOCK (checked at main 62a1f2fa8383), which allows leading whitespace. A model-info response that is not a JSON object is also refused as a HubError. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * gitleaks: exempt the reviewed pin commit ids of manifest-20260926 by value catalogs/sota-convergence/manifest-20260926.json (landscape-sweep-20260926) names the rule id "sourcegraph-access-token" once, in a secrets-credentials refuter's reasoning. The rule's keyword then makes every 40-hex value in the file a candidate. The lane's own free-text commit ids are shortened to 12 characters in the retained evidence. The only 40-hex values left are the 39 distinct git commit ids of the 60 pins that the generator copies from the catalog layer files, and those pins come in free-form shapes such as "v0.44.0; source <id>" and "<id> (blueprints/...)". The allowlist is rule-scoped and limited to that exact file. It exempts only a finding whose secret is exactly one of those reviewed ids, pinned by value like the ai-memory fingerprints. It does not exempt a line shape: an independent review of a first, line-shaped version found that any bare 40-hex value on a pin line, such as a legacy Sourcegraph token or an uppercase variant, would have passed. An unreviewed 40-hex value on a pin line or elsewhere, the uppercase form of a reviewed id, an sgp_-prefixed token, and the reviewed ids in any other file all stay detected. Tests: test_d3 and test_d4 in tests/test_gitleaks_config.py read the pinned ids from .gitleaks.toml, because a 40-hex literal in the test file would itself be a finding. Both fail without the allowlist and pass with it. The full suite passes with GITLEAKS_TESTS_REQUIRED=1 on the pinned gitleaks 8.30.1 (27 tests, none skipped). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape sweep 2026-09-26: record wf_8397ada1-777 and its stopped first attempt Records the 2026-09-26 saturation sweep of all 32 layers (Workflow run wf_8397ada1-777, 201 Claude children at effort max, 80 GPT-6-Astra jobs) with the packaged tools/sota-convergence/landscape-sweep/ harness: - usage_record.py: child-usage complete, with 201 children and 8 superseded attempts (re-run after a Claude usage-limit pause). Three effort deviations (the property-based-testing skill's effort: low) are recorded as retained failures. - convert.py: 32 layers, 287 proposals and 56 survivors (54 repositories), with no lost or excluded rounds. 7 layers have Claude-only discovery, 9 layers have no first-round GPT-6 fit votes, and 18 layers are reopened. GPT-6 jobs: ok 64, failed_exit_null 8, failed_exit_3 6, failed_exit_1 2; copy check match 64. Nine run-specific lane limits cover the prototype harness, the cut known-repository slugs, the GPT-6 failures and their causes (the job timeline is retained in gpt6-jobs.json), the seed mapping and the 12 unsurfaced seeds, effort, the Claude usage-limit re-run, call scope, the Codex review step and the earlier attempts. - Redactions: host strings with host_receipts.sanitize(); the manifest builder's credential-name marker; free-text 40-hex commit ids shortened to 12 characters, because the file names the sourcegraph-access-token rule. - source_reviews.py: one upstream-provenance review per surviving repository (53 GitHub, 1 Hugging Face model). - build_manifest.py: catalogs/sota-convergence/manifest-20260926.json. Its Codex review step is this run's GPT-6 lanes, not a separate review. - make_result.py and saturation_ledger.py --append: landscape-sweep-20260926 (completed) after landscape-sweep-20260926-attempt-1 (wf_a874897e-af1, stopped, lower-bound usage). Reopen entries also copy the saturation report's current pin_moved and selection_changed triggers. The one-layer smoke wf_1753e674-5dc is retained as an attempt without a ledger record. - The Tavily Research cross-check is kept as discovery leads only (no report text, hashed request ids). - independent-review.json records a separate headless Opus review (read-only): needs_changes with six low findings, all repaired in this branch (one repair round). Evidence class: proposals, refuter votes and upstream source reviews. Nothing was installed and no winner changed. manifests/evidence.json is not edited here: the coordinator registers the new and changed files. With a simulated registration, saturation_ledger.py --check --base origin/main, scripts/validate.py and the harness and ledger tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape-sweep tools: record capped WebSearch calls and refutations by absence Repairs two defects that the review of the 2026-09-26 record found in the packaged lane. WebSearch session cap. Claude Code allows one session at most CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_WEB_SEARCHES_PER_SESSION WebSearch calls (default 200 since v2.1.212), counted across the main conversation and every subagent. A capped call returns a notice that tells the worker to go on without searching (tools-reference "Session search limit"; env-vars; the 2.1.283 client's default is Q=200). The lane's budgets allow 480 discovery and 640 refuter searches, so a full sweep can pass the cap unnoticed: - child-usage.mjs counts each child's WebSearch calls and capped calls (web_search, from tool_use/tool_result pairs; the notice must open the result section) and totals them per run. Neither usage nor exit codes change. - convert.py --usage makes every capped worker a web_search_capped retained failure of its layer (the critic's of every layer), as with effort_deviation. - make_result.py refuses a usage record without a measured web_search, or one whose capped workers the returns do not list as that failure. - The harness README (Coordination), the recipe and usage_record.py say how to raise the cap before a full sweep. Refuted by absence. A proposal refuted only because a vote did not return (the GPT-6 fit vote in nine layers of 2026-09-26) counted downstream as refuted on merit: as known in later sweeps and as previous_sweep.refuted in the next discovery input. - convert.py marks a missing facts vote {missing: true} (fit members already were) and names such proposals in the layer's votes_note. - saturation_ledger.py: refutes_on_merit and refuted_by_absence read the marker; adjudicated_repos leaves those entries out in --check and --append, so a later re-proposal stays new. Existing records are unaffected: none before 2026-09-26 has such an entry. - build_inputs.py lists them under previous_sweep.not_adjudicated with a note. Tests: node test-child-usage.mjs (46), tests.test_landscape_sweep_harness and tests.test_saturation_ledger (one expected failure until the coordinator registers this branch's evidence), tests.test_verdict_lane_vendoring; SHA256SUMS updated for the two changed example files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape sweep 2026-09-26 record: WebSearch cap and refutations by absence The repair round for the record review's two findings, rebuilt with the tools of 1bd2416b. - Usage: the three usage records were re-measured with child-usage.mjs at 1bd2416b. Every usage figure is unchanged, and each record gains web_search. In wf_8397ada1-777, 200 WebSearch calls were made, 154 returned results and 46 were capped, in 30 workers. The first capped call was at 04:10:13Z and the last at 11:55:57Z. Run 1 made 25 calls and the smoke 1, none capped. The compact attempt records copy those counts. - convert.py: counts unchanged (32 layers, 287 proposals, 56 survivors, no lost or excluded round; copy check match 64). returns.json differs from the previous record only by 61 added web_search_capped failures: 29 for workers in 16 layers and one for the critic in each of the 32 layers. All 32 layers are reopened. No layer is clean. agent-sdks, backtesting-engine and token-efficiency were clean before this repair. - Lane limits: limit 3 now states the 27 proposals refuted by absence, limit 7 gives the measured WebSearch counts, and the new limit 10 covers the session cap. The manifest was rebuilt; only its lane limits changed, and its 39 pin ids are unchanged. - Ledger: both 2026-09-26 records were re-appended onto origin/main's ledger. The records gain nine votes_note entries, the new reopen entries and a note on the cap. known/new, survived and refuted are unchanged. - README: new sections on the WebSearch session cap and on refuted by absence, a regenerated layer table, and the second review round with the rejected alternative (new GPT-6 fit votes would come from a new model run, not from this run). independent-review.json records that second round. Verification, with a simulated registration of every new and changed file: saturation_ledger.py --check --base origin/main passes, and scripts/validate.py passes. The CI-style suites pass: test_saturation_ledger, test_landscape_sweep_harness, test_verdict_lane_vendoring and test_gitleaks_config (181 tests, 2 skipped for bash 3.2 and shellcheck). node test-child-usage.mjs passes (46). The coordinator registers the files in manifests/evidence.json. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape sweep 2026-09-26 record: GPT-6 cached web search and the Tavily lead vetting Adds two facts to the record of wf_8397ada1-777 and regenerates it with the packaged tools, as the previous rounds did. - Lane limit 11: every GPT-6-Astra lane, discovery and fit, searched Codex's cached web index, not the live web. The prototype runner started each job as codex --search exec. The #332 Codex qualification (sota-refresh-20260926/codex/results/websearch-0.155.1.json and websearch-0.157.1.json, local stand-in provider) shows --search before exec (W1) and no flag (W2) both sending external_web_access: false, and -c web_search="live" (W3) sending true. The coordinator's observation of a real 0.157.1 live search is not retained. GPT-6 discoveries and votes rested on the cached index, and the release and activity facts GPT-6 cited may lag upstream; with limit 10, no lane after 04:10:13Z had live web search except through gh api and WebFetch. Future runs pass -c web_search="live"; the codex_job.py fix follows in a separate PR. - Regeneration: convert.py with all eleven --limit values (exit 3 for the same two notes; summary identical to the previous round), redaction, id shortening, the credential-name marker and build_manifest.py (pin ids unchanged: 60 occurrences, 39 distinct). returns.json and layers.json are byte-identical; lanes.json and manifest-20260926.json differ only by the added limit. - Ledger: both 2026-09-26 records were re-appended onto origin/main's ledger (unchanged since 3822178). Only manifest_sha256 (both records), one added note on limit 11 (completed record) and the chain hashes changed. - Addendum tavily-leads-vetting.json: the lead vetting of wf_6a6cb7b8-c22 (Sonnet screen, then the sweep's facts refuter and two-family fit refuters). 136 leads in 30 layers, 100 dismissed, 36 proposed, 29 kept, 0 survivors; the Claude fit refuter refuted all 29, GPT-6 21, the facts refuter 4; 8 split cases where GPT-6 did not refute but Claude did. Discovery-completeness evidence, not a verdict, with both search limits (Claude WebSearch capped: 2 calls, both capped; GPT-6 cached). Sanitized with host_receipts.sanitize(); one ref reads <checkout>. Its 23 40-hex ids are shortened to 12 characters, as in returns.json, because the file names sourcegraph/* leads (gitleaks sourcegraph-access-token rule). Its usage record child-usage-wf_6a6cb7b8-c22.json (usage_record.py): complete, 75 children at effort max. - README: GPT-6 cached web search and lead vetting sections, limit 11, files, redaction, verification; limit 11 and the addendum are not yet reviewed. Verification, with a simulated registration of every new and changed file: saturation_ledger.py --check --base origin/main passes (4 records, chain intact) and scripts/validate.py passes. tests.test_saturation_ledger and tests.test_landscape_sweep_harness: 141 run, OK, 2 skipped (no bash 3.2, no shellcheck). tests.test_gitleaks_config and tests.test_verdict_lane_vendoring: 40 run, OK, once another scan's per-user gitleaks lock was free. Without the registration, test_the_committed_ledger_checks fails only on unregistered lane files, as before. manifests/evidence.json is not edited; the coordinator registers the files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Register the landscape-sweep-20260926 record (hot-file commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape-sweep tools: superseded attempts keep usage-integrity failures; failure coverage per worker and layer Repairs the two P2 findings of a read-only GPT-6-Astra review (max effort, live search) of the 2026-09-26 record's checkout. Each repair comes with a regression test that failed before it. (A) child-usage.mjs: a superseded attempt whose transcript held an assistant message without provider usage left the run status "complete", although by_resolved_model could not count that usage, so downstream usage could be marked complete falsely. An attempt's usage-integrity failures (an assistant message without provider usage or without a resolved model, or no transcript file) are now its usage_issues; a superseded attempt with any makes the run incomplete (the reason names them) and the CLI exit 1. Its other issues (no result entry, the <synthetic> usage-limit row outside the family) stay expected, and an attempt that made no request still counts as zero usage. usage_record.py's summary names such attempts (superseded_usage_issues). test-child-usage.mjs: four new checks failed before the repair (missing usage, unresolved model, no transcript, CLI exit); a guard for an attempt without requests passes. SHA256SUMS updated for the two changed files. (B) make_result.py: failure coverage was checked over all layers at once, so removing one layer's critic-cap failure and its reopen entry still passed (another layer's "critic" failure satisfied the check) and that layer derived a clean count of 1. effort_deviation and web_search_capped failures are now checked per worker and per layer, with the mapping convert.py records them by (deviation_rounds, moved unchanged to sweep_common.py): a <role>:<layer>[:followup] worker's failure in that layer's round, the critic's in every layer of the record; a worker naming no layer of the record is refused as before. test_failure_coverage_is_checked_per_worker_and_per_layer drops the critic's cap failure, then its effort deviation, from one of two healthy layers, and moves a worker's failure to the other layer; all three subtests failed before the repair. Docs: the harness README (evidence contract, WebSearch cap, review repairs) and the workflows README. Tests: test-child-usage.mjs 51 passed, test-usage-receipts.mjs 18, test-envelope.mjs 214, test-contract-mutations.mjs 47; test-codex-envelope.mjs and check-syntax.mjs exit 0. tests.test_saturation_ledger, tests.test_landscape_sweep_harness, tests.test_adoption_docs_consistency and tests.test_verdict_lane_vendoring: 198 run, OK (3 skipped: no bash 3.2, no shellcheck, no profile coverage change since the pinned release). manifests/evidence.json is not edited; the coordinator registers the changed files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Landscape sweep 2026-09-26 record: re-measured usage, GPT-6 review round, lane limit 12 Regenerated once with the pipeline of the earlier rounds, on the tools of 7760b1da, so the manifest sha changes once. - Usage: the three usage records were re-measured with child-usage.mjs at 7760b1da (sha256 85b95813...730d). Each child_usage is identical to the 1bd2416b measurement: wf_8397ada1-777 stays complete (none of its 8 superseded attempts holds uncounted usage) and run 1 stays incomplete, so lower_bound_usage and every ledger outcome are unchanged. Only tool_commit, tool_sha256 and measured_at_utc changed. - Lane limit 12, a dated correction from the trading lane's review of #357: the execution-broker proposal of wboayue/rust-ibapi (a re-pin through nautilus_trader PR #5041) attributes #4983 to rc5. Checked with gh api: #4983's body reports Version v1.227.0; 1b0a49d2 is identical to tag v2.0.0rc5, and there crates/adapters/interactive_brokers/src/execution/ core.rs:493-495 overrides handles_order_venue to return true, so the ClientVenueMismatch denial behind crates/execution/src/engine/mod.rs:2222 cannot fire for the IB client; the open PR #280 reclassifies #4983 in catalogs/us-equities/runtime-target.json. Read instead: rc5 IBKR execution is unqualified (no rc5 stock order observed). The proposal text is kept. - convert.py with limits 1-12: exit 3 on the same two notes, summary identical. returns.json and layers.json are byte-identical; lanes.json and manifest-20260926.json differ only by the added limit (pin ids unchanged: 60 occurrences, 39 distinct). - make_result.py with the per-worker, per-layer coverage check passes on this record and gives the same RESULT.json. - Ledger: both 2026-09-26 records were re-appended onto origin/main's ledger (803bc35, unchanged since 3822178). Only manifest_sha256, usage_sha256 and the chain hashes changed. - README and independent-review.json: the third review round (GPT-6-Astra, NOT_READY, two P2 findings, both reproduced and repaired in 7760b1da) and the trading lane's correction. Verification, with a simulated registration of the 18 changed registered files: saturation_ledger.py --check --base origin/main passes (4 records, chain intact) and scripts/validate.py passes. Tests: tests.test_saturation_ledger, tests.test_landscape_sweep_harness, tests.test_adoption_docs_consistency and tests.test_verdict_lane_vendoring 198 run, OK (3 skipped: no bash 3.2, no shellcheck, no profile coverage change); test-child-usage.mjs 51 passed; tests.test_gitleaks_config 27 OK. manifests/evidence.json is not edited; the coordinator registers the changed files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * Re-register the repaired sweep record (hot-file commit) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Scout <scout@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-01T00:05:26Z

Trading lane, 2026-10-01 ~00:10Z (native-agent-stack-ae): upstream re-check before asking for the sign-in. Read through the GitHub API, read-only.

nautilus_trader#4983 (Rust IB adapter: venue IB never matches SMART, so every stock order is denied locally): open. It was last updated 2026-09-12.
nautilus_trader#5041 (port the Interactive Brokers adapter onto ibapi 4.2.0, base develop): open, not merged. It was last updated 2026-09-30T13:39Z.
Releases: the latest stable is v1.231.0 (2026-08-02). The latest 2.0 is the prerelease v2.0.0rc5 (2026-09-15). No 2.0.x release contains #5041.

So the decision record's choice stands: local acceptance on NautilusTrader 1.231.0 with ibapi 10.45.1. Its comparator arm (the first 2.0.x release containing #5041) does not exist yet. Nothing in this PR changes. The next step is still the user's paper IB Gateway sign-in (second factor).

…cts, #4983 reconciliation, SPY parity superseding note (#578) * Trading layers: closure assessment artifact, owner's verdicts, #4983 reconciliation, SPY parity superseding note - evidence/artifacts/layer-closure-assessment-20261001/us-equities.json, -run-variance.json, -synthesis.md: the 12 us-equities layers' closure assessment (one Opus assessor and one adversarial Opus refuter per layer, at PR #358's head 4d11709), in foundation.json's form, sanitized (private session paths become <session-scratch>); README rows for them. - docs/decisions/2026-10-01-trading-layer-verdicts.md: the trading lane owner's verdicts. No trading layer is closed; all 12 are "selection of record, open", with the blocking item, gates and evidence class per layer. It corrects one assessor claim (the SPY blockers are costs_and_rounding_stress and margin_and_adaptive_state, not a "costs_and_routing" contract). - catalogs/us-equities/runtime-target.json: nautilus_trader #4983 moves to rc5_reclassified_reports as a stale v1.227.0 report (source reading at 1b0a49d2: engine/mod.rs:2222 and the IB client's handles_order_venue returning true, core.rs:491-496); the rc5 obstacles listed instead are #5007, #5057, #5060 (open) and #4946 (closed upstream, in no release), states re-read 2026-10-01; PR #5041 head and ibapi =4.2.0 re-read. The structure follows PR #280 hunks 2-3; its version-selection hunk stays in #280. - blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/acceptance-plan.md: a dated superseding note after the September 21 status table (one_zero PASS 2026-09-23, five unmapped cases, IBKR step 1). Checks: scripts/validate_catalogs.py exit 0; tests.test_catalogs plus the modules that read runtime-target.json (test_blind_checkout, test_ecosystem_manifest, test_lane_packets, test_token_e2e_receipt_checks) Ran 338, OK (skipped=2). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Register the trading closure files in the evidence manifest (hot-file protocol, last commit) manifests/evidence.json: main's copy (25098f8) with runtime-target.json, acceptance-plan.md, the artifact README and the three new us-equities artifact files registered through scripts/host_receipts.register_file; no receipts[] or convergence_records[] entry. component_matrix.py --write and new_host_grand_list.py --write re-run (no change). scripts/validate.py exit 0; scripts/evidence_manifest.py --check passed (8783 files). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Trading closure: repair after the independent review; owner selections for the two layers without one Independent Opus review of e9459f6 (changes-needed: 1 high, 2 medium, 5 low), all repaired: - high: #4983 was still the rc5 blocker in runtime-target.json's separate-paper-adapters entry, the decision record's execution-broker gates, gates-20260922.json and the two IBKR READMEs. Each now points at rc5_blockers (#5007, #5057, #5060 open; #4946 fixed on develop in no release) and rc5_reclassified_reports (#4983), with dated superseding notes. - medium: "costs_and_routing" was the owner's misreading of a truncated assessment string, not an assessor claim; the record now says so, and the README no longer calls it a correction of the assessment. - medium: backtesting-engine's evidence class now cites the unchanged rc5 quickstart (evidence/receipts/native-nautilus-v2-20260920.json) and the rc5 SPY parity one_zero PASS. - low: codex-native-sdk has no stack.json entry; PR #574 named as the architecture edition's location; "newest release is the prerelease v2.0.0rc5" (releases/latest is v1.231.0); run-variance wording ("two complete refuted results"); the README records the us-equities run (last complete result; usage not recorded). Owner selections (decision 7), converging with the 09-22 verdicts, the Opus assessment and the gpt-6-astra adjudication in PR #575: research-factors-ml EdgarTools 5.58.0 + skfolio 1.2.9; security-supply-chain the foundation's Syft 1.52.0, Gitleaks 8.30.1 and Grype 0.119.0. Neither closes the layer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Scout <scout@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

seathatflowsinourveins · 2026-10-07T02:33:04Z

Closed with record (PR triage; the command center's item task-native-agent-stack-5f-20261007T023043Z; disposed by the trading owner, Claude session native-agent-stack-5f).

Branch kept: claude/ibkr-local-acceptance-20260925 at head 9f39d48a2a167fcb0fbd36dd3799b5824e08ba5d.
Artifacts on the branch:
- blueprints/us-equities/engine-nautilus/ibkr-acceptance/: local_acceptance.py, local-acceptance-plan.json, local-acceptance-plan-post.json and its README;
- docs/decisions/2026-09-25-ibkr-local-acceptance-version-selection.md;
- tests/test_ibkr_local_acceptance.py;
- its edits to catalogs/us-equities/gates-20260922.json and runtime-target.json.
Why closed: the gate it prepares, ibkr-local-acceptance, sits on the live rung (status: not_established, owner: user-decision), and live trading is out of scope today. The paper IBKR path runs on the destination engine's own checks instead:
- NautilusTrader 2.0.0rc5 C1-C4 passed on the paper gateway (IBKR paper orders on the destination engine: NautilusTrader 2.0.0rc5 C1-C4 passed (runner around upstream exec_tester; runner-enforced notional bound, #4946) #754);
- the rc6 C5 check is preregistered (trading: preregister C5 for the rc6 IBKR paper checks (engine refuses a SMART order above its cap) #798).
Reopen trigger: any one of these:
- the owner reopens the live rung;
- the owner re-selects the 1.231.0 keep-but-compare comparison;
- a paper gate needs this runner's client-id contention (A2), reconnect (A3) or kill-switch latch (B2, C1) cases, which C1-C5 do not cover.

seathatflowsinourveins and others added 5 commits September 25, 2026 15:46

seathatflowsinourveins added the lane:trading Trading lane: sim, paper and live north star label Sep 25, 2026

seathatflowsinourveins and others added 5 commits September 25, 2026 17:45

This was referenced Sep 26, 2026

Landscape sweep 2026-09-26 record: all 32 layers, 56 survivors, manifest-20260926 for the verdict wave (11 lane limits) #357

Merged

Trading research convergence 2026-09-26: 13 layers, GPT-6 live refutation, verbatim-checked votes (verdict-wave input) #358

Merged

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2026

Roadmap record 2026-09-28: current architecture, recorded targets, gaps and next moves #469

Merged

This was referenced Oct 1, 2026

Final architecture: the new-WSL install manifest (37 rows, none closed) and its tab in the ecosystem guide #574

Merged

Trading layers 2026-10-01: closure assessment artifact, owner's verdicts, #4983 reconciliation, SPY parity superseding note #578

Merged

seathatflowsinourveins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2026

Client configuration for the new distribution: wire only what the definitive manifest installs (map, tool, F9) #608

Merged

5 tasks done

seathatflowsinourveins closed this Oct 7, 2026

seathatflowsinourveins deleted the claude/ibkr-local-acceptance-20260925 branch October 8, 2026 17:05

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

IBKR local acceptance (steps 2-4) prep: awaiting the user's paper IB Gateway sign-in - #280

IBKR local acceptance (steps 2-4) prep: awaiting the user's paper IB Gateway sign-in#280
seathatflowsinourveins wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
claude/ibkr-local-acceptance-20260925

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 26, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 1, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 25, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What

SOTA sources

Second independent review: findings resolved

First independent review: findings resolved

What the user has to do (the steps the run is waiting on)

Evidence

Checks run

Limits and follow-ups

Not established by this PR

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 26, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 1, 2026

Uh oh!

seathatflowsinourveins commented Oct 7, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

seathatflowsinourveins commented Sep 25, 2026 •

edited

Loading