Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Energy only" PET from Milly and Dunne 2016 #27

Open
Aariq opened this issue Nov 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

"Energy only" PET from Milly and Dunne 2016 #27

Aariq opened this issue Nov 1, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Aariq
Copy link

Aariq commented Nov 1, 2021

Milly and Dune (2016) investigate the Penman-Monteith method for calculating PET and find that it overestimates drought compared to non-water-stressed evapotranspiration (which should theoretically be equal). They propose a simplification of Penman-Monteith that better predicts PET: PET = 0.8(R_n - G) where R_n is net radiation at the surface, and G is heat flux into the subsurface, both converted to units of mm/d. This might be a nice addition to the SPEI package.

Milly PCD, Dunne KA (2016) Potential evapotranspiration and continental drying. Nature Clim Change 6:946–949. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3046

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant