You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We could accept an input file that would include table name, row count, index size, table size, etc. and use that information to display more useful error messages.
If a migration is going to lock a table while it scans the whole table, that doesn't matter for a 300 row table, but does for a 3,000,000 row table.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Are rules that require access to a database welcome in squawk?
That said, the database instance which migrations are developed against is usually not biggest database that it will be run against. And locking a million-row table that gets no queries may be ok, but locking a thousand-row table that gets queried constantly could be bad.
Printing warnings based on the size of tables in a development environment may be misleading.
Related to #116
We could accept an input file that would include table name, row count, index size, table size, etc. and use that information to display more useful error messages.
If a migration is going to lock a table while it scans the whole table, that doesn't matter for a 300 row table, but does for a 3,000,000 row table.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: