-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance #10
Comments
Hi, I can't say exactly from where the performance draw back is coming from.
I assume that you run via docker-plugin, have you try via cli (not a plugin running in a container) ? https://github.com/sapk/docker-volume-gluster#legacy-plugin-installation |
I am not sure what happened with my first test, but I did a retry today with all the different variations. All the results are now in the same range. If you want you can share that info with the community.
Test Scenario: Bind Mount
Old School Plugin usage
New Style Plugin
|
Thanks for the insigth, |
I have referenced this issue in the readme for insigth. |
I quickly did a performance test:
For the reference, I did the same test but this time with an mounted local gluster host volume.
The difference is 68MB/s to 5MB/s so it is more or less a factor 10 difference between the two results.
Do you have an idea if and how the drive can be improved so it is on par with fuse mounted glusterfs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: