Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Glyph Request: Retro Computer Logos #1447

Closed
oshaboy opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Glyph Request: Retro Computer Logos #1447

oshaboy opened this issue Dec 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
❲+❳ add glyph to core set keep_unlocked Allow discuissions for extended time even after closing

Comments

@oshaboy
Copy link

oshaboy commented Dec 2, 2023

Context
Fairfax HD and Nishiki Teki already have these if you want a source font. In those they are mostly meant for compatibility with Retro Computing Fonts.

Logos in no particular order:

Name Fairfax Assignment Nishiki-teki Assignment
Atari FFCE4 F896
Commodore FFCE5 F897
Amiga FFCE6/FFCE7 F898/F899
Acorn FFCF0 F883
Apple Lisa FFCF1 F882
Bell Labs FFCF8
Data General FFCF9 FDBF9
Atari in 2 parts FFCFA+FFCFB FDBFA+FDBFB
Commander X16 (Not technically retro but close enough) F5FF F5FF

There are also some old PUA Emoji that were too "IP Encumbered" for Unicode which should probably be a different Issue. And the Google Assistant Logo. Also some really weird stuff like Betty Boop, Bob Dobbs in 4 parts, Logo of the Workers Party of Korea, and something called a "Dogcow". Which I think are out of scope for nerd fonts.

image
image

Paging #1095.

@Finii
Copy link
Collaborator

Finii commented Mar 24, 2024

Closing because transferred to #1095

@Finii Finii closed this as completed Mar 24, 2024
@Finii Finii added the keep_unlocked Allow discuissions for extended time even after closing label Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
❲+❳ add glyph to core set keep_unlocked Allow discuissions for extended time even after closing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants